[ cgl / con / g / mu / qa / w ] [ index / top / reports / FAQ / DAAS / IG / status / transparency / fuuka ] [ img-search ]
As Dark As My Soul Default Fuuka

/mu/ - Music (Temp full images)


View post   

File: 45 KB, 640x480, ame.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55492599 No.55492599 [Reply] [Original]

What qualifies good taste?

Would you say that A) listening to critically acclaimed, historically important works from various genres and periods of music qualifies as good taste?
Or B) being knowledgeable in a single niche - from the historically important to the forgotten and unknown - is what qualifies good taste?

The way I see it, A) seems like a "jack of all trades master of none" scenario and only reasonable to the most casual of casual music listeners who don't have the time or wit to explore music on their own, whereas B) - while it may seem more limited than A) when taken at face value - ends up being more useful than A), in the sense that the intense autism of these limited niche diggers grants them deeper knowledge, which you can use for your own musical schooling if you bother asking them to share their sheer knowledge (presenting you the choice to transform into an A) or a B) of your own, as well).

Anyway, yeah. What in your opinion makes good taste /mu/? Hard more for not using subjective/objective bs.

>> No.55492625

>>55492599
B.) but without being closed-minded
Also if you listen to rock music mainly, you are automatically pleb

>> No.55492657

Liking good music.

>> No.55492767

>>55492599
A) gives a wide berth of a starting point for listening to different genres, since you would be some what adapted to each genre and will be able to comfortably explore other works from that point, so I would actually go with A). Keeping with one niche like B) makes you more of a guy with no interest in music other than what you listen to. It leads to closed mindedness.

>> No.55492864

Not liking every respected album (like, some /mu/core can actually be bad/good).

>> No.55492906

>>55492599
Being open minded, having a wide variety in your taste and actively trying to discover new music all the time is good taste in my opinion.

>> No.55493048

>>55492599
liking 60's and 70's music of course :) today's music is shit

>> No.55493090

more interesting question:
discover new music every day?
or just gaining big amount of scrobbles of few artists?
What is more patrician?

>> No.55493101

>>55493048
gr8 b8 m8

>> No.55493166

>>55493090
not scrobbling is more patrician

>> No.55493227

>>55492599
i agree that digging deep is pretty helpful of course. its also more exciting
also reminder that "taste" is entirely ones own "sensibility", not the selection of music it makes you delve into, even though of course what you consume sharpens or widens it. one could potentially listen to only great albums and still have shit taste. or nah?

>> No.55493347

Good taste doesn't exists. When people say someone has good taste they just mean he listens to the same music they like. You can't possibly have good or bad taste. It's all to subjective to be measured.

>> No.55493363

>>55492599
>ame.jpg
>no timestamp

So gullible.

>> No.55493383

>>55493347
So you think someone who listens to crunkcore and scenecore has equal taste to everyone else?

>> No.55493404

>>55493383
To that person sure
to everybody else no.

>> No.55493419

>>55493404
>to everybody else no.

Are you somehow implying people who don't listen to crunkcore and scenecore have better taste?

>> No.55493459

fuck u

>> No.55493471

>>55493347
that's not even true you unterplen

Good taste absolutely exists and so does bad taste. Someone who has good taste has an open mind about all music, and can find something they like in almost every album regardless of their familiarity. Someone with bad taste is really just someone who isn't interested in music the same way and uses it as a background music without ever paying attention to it.

>> No.55493481

listening to what i like means you have good taste

>> No.55493488

>>55493471
>le good taste people like everything meme

retarded af

>> No.55493490

>>55492625
B) is only good if you apply it to art music
otherwise A) is superior since it entails art music listening

>> No.55493496

This doesn't really speak to taste per se, but the most important thing is to be open about what you listen to, try anything at least one time, and try to be consistent with your judgement.

Otherwise, whether or not I consider you to have good taste hinges on how well your taste fits into my worldview (not necessarily how well it matches up to my own but it will often have some similarities, of course). If I think your taste paints the picture of a real person, I will probably think it's good.

>> No.55493531

>>55493419
yes and no, the thing about taste is both parties of good and bad want to be correct and hate being wrong.

I hate this channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rD1qKMgTnAE but this video did a good example of what good/bad taste means Enjoy !

>> No.55493533

>>55493363
I think when it was originally posted with a trip the face was blanked out and then someone found the original from when it was posted anonymously before that.

>> No.55493534

Remember, just as long as you're not OP you have nothing to be worried about in terms of music taste

>> No.55493553

>>55493488
>implying that's what I said
why do I respond to retards?

>> No.55493580

>>55493490
>B) is only good if you apply it to art music
>otherwise A) is superior since it entails art music listening
Completely agree with you.

>> No.55493605

tip for you fucking retards:
patrician is the listener not the music he listens to

>> No.55493671

>>55492599

I think it's worth it to try to "get better taste", but not in some objective sense. I think people should continually re-evaluate what music they think they like, and hopefully come closer to the kind of music they really prefer
basically I see "improving one's taste" as some variety of becoming more like who you actually are. if you're listening to music that's at variance with your nature, you're not gonna enjoy it too much. to discover what actually causes you genuine and lasting excitement, pleasure, meaning, whatever - is my goal anyhow

>> No.55493925

>>55493490 (You)
>>55493580 (You)
All me btw.

>> No.55494011

>>55493490
>>55493580
>Art music
>not folk music
gb2 your containment general

>>>/classical/

>> No.55494053

>>55492599
Being capable of advocating and elaborating your opinions in your own words is what constitutes technically good taste in anything, not just music.

>> No.55494097

>>55494011
>>Patrician music
>>not Pleb music
>gb2 your containment general

>>>>/classical/

>> No.55494122

>>55494053
>being a good orator is having good taste
kek

>> No.55494142
File: 15 KB, 1135x128, pats vs plebs.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55494142

>>55494097
>

>> No.55494201
File: 20 KB, 275x200, shrug.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55494201

>>55494122
Taste implies opinions. Well-articulated interesting opinions are better to me than poorly articulated and/or parroting opinions.

Sorry dude.

>> No.55494415

B) > A)

Musical Maturity Lesson #001: Introspect as a Means of Maximizing Success

Discovering and accepting musical biases, and employing your self-knowledge in a way conducive to the discovery and appreciation of good music
>example 1: "I really like 'x' (where 'x' can be a style, instrument, aesthetic, etc.) therefore I will seek out music with 'x' because I understand I am more likely to enjoy them."
>example 2: "I really dislike "x" (where 'x' can be a style, instrument, aesthetic, etc.) therefore I will avoid music containing 'x' for now because I understand I am less likely to enjoy them and prefer to keep my time as conducive to the discovery and appreciation of good music as possible."
It is perfectly okay (and even encouraged) to dismiss a genre of music if you hold strong bias against the prominent aesthetics that define that genre.
To imply that all genres are of equal worth, or that no genre is "devoid of good music" is a sign of both musical immaturity and unrefined taste.
>note: Accepting your musical biases does not mean to become complacent with them- quite to the contrary in fact. By pinpointing what you do and don't like, you can be much more effective in your search for good music by paying closer attention to the descriptions of and content within new musics.
>note 2: It is encouraged to be as specific and analytic with your musical biases as possible- dismissing large chunks of things merely because they fall under a vague or broad term can be a grave mistake, and putting too much on your plate at once with overly wide musical fetishes can be tiring.

>> No.55494421

>>55493925

Actually, those are both me. Taking credit for the hard work of others is going too far

>> No.55494504

>>55494415
You shouldn't dismiss something because of bias. THAT is stupid. What's not stupid is to say that what you've heard so far doesn't appeal to you

>> No.55494640

>>55494415
I really like this, thanks for sharing.

For the purpose of making a similar point to yours in this thread I tried to find something I'd written down from I think Cioran to the effect of 'for the purposes of criticism, rather than trying to address all sides of an issue, it's sometimes better to approach it from one side only'

>> No.55494703

Your own taste is the best one there is.
Everyone else has shit taste.

That's all you need to know about music taste.

>> No.55495947

>>55494703
/thread

>> No.55497462

>>55492599
Taste is subjective, no one has "good" or "bad" taste.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action