I haven't visited this site in a year or two, casually stumbled across this article and I actually thought it was really good. What do you guys think? Are they stepping up their game or is it just a gem in the rough? Is my taste trash? Who knows :^)http://pitchfork.com/features/resonant-frequency/8713-this-is-me-music-making-as-re-blog/http://pitchfork.com/features/resonant-frequency/8713-this-is-me-music-making-as-re-blog/
>>55020432Resonant Frequency is a column that often focuses on experimental music and philosophical inquiry about music. I would recommend reading p4k's columns, but don't bother with "The Pitch" because they're all click bait pieces from outside writers with shit mindsets. At its heart Pitchfork is a good publication, but it is littered with shit. Only several of their review staff can write well.
>>55020558I tend to not read any reviews that incorporate a numerical rating system anyway, maybe with the exception of FactMag
>>55020432Mark Richardson is pretty much the only reason I still give p4k any attention. I wish being editor in chief gave him more reign over what they post. The pitchfork podcast, which is also done by him, is worth checking out too.