How do I into vinyl, /mu/?
buy your favorite albums in vinyl
>>54492548Did Dean ever get back up?
>>54492548buy a decent-good record player and then buy some recordsreally difficult stuff
>>54492604What's a decent-good record player?
>>54492616one with a counterweight
>>54492739Any specific models or brands you recommend?
>>54492976avoid audiotechnica and crosley and you should be fine. i use a music hall, it's a great model, 200-300 bucks retail.record players that cost less than 150 are typically not the ones that you want.
>>54492548Who is the Dean of music?
>>54492548Don't get into vinyl, cassettes are what all the cool kids are into now. Vinyl is fedora crosly tier.
>>54493025Would something like the music hall usb-1 be able to play 78 bpm vinyl properly?
Get the Crosby one that looks like a briefcase from urban outfitters
>>54492548sorry in advance for making this
>>54494838I don't get it
>>54492548crosley
>>54494605>>54495553Even I know this is bait.
>>54494439Nope! But there are some add-ons you can buy that will let you play 78s. Also, you'd need a needle used specifically for 78 RPM records. If you use the sort of needle used for 33s and 45s on 78s, you'll wear it out in no time. Best option is to purchase a separate turntable for 78s. As for a good turntable, I'd recommend the U-turn Orbit Plus. It's got an acrylic platter, counterweight, and comes with a Grado Black cartridge. Really bitchin' setup for the price, damn good deal. ~$300
been looking for this thread, can someone let me know if i did well on this? i bought my first record player today. had to get the other sound system and speakers along with it but it sounds amazing.basically, did i do better than buying a crosley? it's a pro-ject xtension 9 evo ?dunno bout the stereo and speakers but the dudes said they were alright but weren't too big a deal for me.
bought my first record player today and wanted to ask /mu/ somethingit's a pro-ject carbon or something and sounds wonderful but i don't know shit about record players. basically my question is it better than a crosley ?
Audio technica lp 120 Avoid the Lp 60 though because no counterweight.
>>54497094You did well. Million times better than a crosley.
>>54492590fuck i'm laffin
>>54497094>buy record player>then ask if its any goodWhat
>>54494838i went to go see Dean Ween Group a couple days ago and waited an hour after the show to talk to Deaner and he never came outside. I was bummed.
Best Buy sells a Sony turntable for ~$110. It's definitely on the lower end of the spectrum but isn't bad for a starter turntable.Carbons are probably the best you can do for an entry level turntable, but a $400 price tag is difficult to swallow for people who aren't even sure if vinyl is for them.
>>54497094anything is better than crosely
>>54492548>>54494838>saving images in .jpegKill yourselves.
>>54498173Leave.
>>54498119well i talked to the dude at the record store for like an hour about iti'm just hoping / wondering if i got swindled. they didn't even have crosleys or audio techblahblah ones. only like super expensive ones. sorry i guess
>>54498194>>>/out/
>>54498211Stop repeating shit that you heard on /b/ or troll shit from /g/.
>>54498254>on /b/Fair enough, though I haven't visited that hellhole for five years.>from /g/If you can't see what jpeg did to those images, then you are beyond help. Facebook might be a better place for you.
>>54498300>actually caring about the image quality of a fucking reposted meme imageHoly shit how fucking retarded are you? This isn't a photography board nor is the quality of that image even relevant. Get the fuck out.
>>54498300Why would facebook be a better place for that person?Just curious
>>54498328A picture will be basically unreadable after two years of faggots like you saving it in jpeg.>>54498337Plebs on Facebook save compressed versions of jpeg graphic pictures they see on their wall and repost them in... jpeg.
>>54498406Can you provide a source that people save compressed versions of jpeg graphic pictures they see on their wall and repost them?
>>54498434Here you go.
>>54498406Oh ok, so you're actually just a parroting idiot. Thank you for letting me know.
>>54498173why? i didn't want to save the pic in .png so i saved it as .jpeg
>>54498489But, if the post in OP's picture was really the original, how would him posting a picture he took onto facebook be wrong? He's not exactly re-posting if that is in fact the original post made to facebook, it's an original that he couldn't see on his wall since it was never on there before he posted itPlease, give me some sources that people do the things you say they do