[ cgl / con / g / mu / qa / w ] [ index / top / reports / FAQ / DAAS / IG / status / transparency / fuuka ] [ img-search ]
As Dark As My Soul Default Fuuka

/mu/ - Music (Temp full images)


View post   

File: 88 KB, 973x794, 1422497820098.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54306095 No.54306095 [Reply] [Original]

Are you a music snob?

>> No.54306138

>flick
>mulholland drive

plebs, when will they learn.

>> No.54306150

>>54306095
define music snob

>> No.54306273

yeah i listen to kanye and my bloody valentine im pretty hardcore xppp

>> No.54306332

>>54306150

snobbish in regard to music

>> No.54306410

>>54306332
but what would make someone a snob? thinking his taste that everything else or sometihng?

>> No.54306562

I don't know, I probably am to a lot of people. I don't think so though...

I like Arvo Pärt, Miles Davis, Swans, Rachmaninof, GZA, Death Grips, Popol Vuh and This Heat. They're a few of my favourites, and I think most people here have heard all of them. I'm probably more plebby than most /mu/tants.

>> No.54306675

>do i have strong opinions about what i listen to?
yes

>do i volunteer those opinions to people who didn't ask?
no

>do i hate certain music because it's popular?
no

>do i like certain music because it's obscure?
no

>do i believe the best music *tends* to be obscure?
yes

>do i believe most artists deserve the recognition they receive?
no

>do i believe the general public's taste is credible?
no

>do i believe music serves more purposes than just its own aesthetic qualities?
yes

>do i respect people who are into music?
yes

>do i think that lots of people who are into music are annoying?
yes

>do i think i'm well-versed in the breadth of human achievement in music?
no

>do i think i have better taste than the average person?
yes

>do i respect the opinion of most music websites?
no

>am i familiar with music theory?
yes

>do i think music theory-based credits are a legitimate merit of music?
no

>does bad music viscerally offend me?
yes

>what do i think music taste is based on?
emotional intelligence and attention span

>> No.54306806

>>54306675
>emotional intelligence and attention span

fucking this. Man, I wish the people I show music to sometimes would at least listen to a full song before calling it shit.

>> No.54306826

>>54306675
Lamest post of 2015

>> No.54306865

>>54306095
whats the top left movie?

>> No.54306939

>>54306562
yeah thats pretty standard here, but thats the thing, snobbiness is all perspective based

to someone who only listens to the radio, they'd find you to be some huge music elitist, but if someone who was to exclusively listen to art music were to critique your taste, they'd find it shallow and poppy

>> No.54306951

>>54306675
>emotional intelligence and attention span
Bullshit, it's based on iq because of pattern recognition.

Someone who is stupid won't be able to listen to glitch or noise music because they will be bored by it.

Also eq is made up and women have higher eq yet have shit taste so you wrong bitch.

>> No.54307246

Classical music is a higher art form, whereas rock is a lower one. In today's postmodern college-whatever world, "high" and "low" are blasphemies, but I think they are very real differences. Western classical music is the oldest literate musical tradition in the world, and has been treated as an intellectual art form for hundreds of years—in contrast, other traditional/popular musics come from folk traditions, i.e. not written down. Art simply cannot be developed to the same extent without having a literate system to carry ideas from one generation to the next, not to mention across borders and cultures. The difference is similar to cultures that have an oral tradition (no writing), vs. written literature. Of course, there is great value to an oral tradition, and it is not worse, but it certainly is less cultivated. And the same goes for popular music vis-à-vis classical.

>> No.54307342

>>54307246
daily reminder that written transcripts are inessential in the art of sound and have been made obsolete by recordings if you only consider the longevity and stability of it

>> No.54307474

>Nattvardsgästerna

Great movie (i don't care that stupid meme)

>> No.54310079

>>54306675
nice pasta.

>> No.54310147

>>54306865
Probably too late, but it's Winter Light/Nattvardsgästerna by Ingmar Bergman. Amazing movie.

>> No.54310221

>>54306095
this image is incredibly retarded

>> No.54310338

>>54306095
what are the cinema and flick?

>> No.54310471
File: 85 KB, 594x396, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54310471

>>54306951
>putting IQ significantly over EQ
>using glitch and noise as examples of "intelligent" music
>blatant misogyny for no raisin
wow i honestly didn't even believe in fedoras until i read this post damn

>> No.54310481
File: 49 KB, 1280x500, loscomulgantescinereligioso.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54310481

>>54310338
Cinema is >>54310147 and the "flick" is Mulholland Drive, also good btw.

>> No.54311509

>>54310471
Way to tear him a new one bud, glad to have people like you on this board

>> No.54311591
File: 3.29 MB, 2600x1000, art 1.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54311591

>>54306095
/tv/ is phenomenal, pic related

>> No.54311731

>>54311591
Ugh.

>> No.54311803

I judge people on their music taste, so probably yes.

>> No.54312665

>>54311591
>video games
>not depression quest

>> No.54312694

>>54311803
>I'm 15 years old

OH IT SHOWS, ANON, IT SHOWS

>> No.54312723

>>54306095
compared to most people, yes.

>> No.54312734

>>54311591
GOAT troll pic.

>> No.54313026

>>54307246
You realise people carried ideas down from one generation to the next with oral tradition right? There's a reason things like the Eddas exist and it's because people were reciting them word for word for hundreds to thousands of years before they were written down. You don't need a literate system for art to progress, you need people with an aptitude for learning, and actually oral tradition can help train this ability because the permission to write makes people lazy. Ancient Celts were all literate yet religiously forbidden to write and had to learn all their songs, books, poetry, etc orally and that's how they were passed down for a millenium before Iulius Cæsar destroyed them, and they were well known in the ancient world for their arts and sciences which they had cultivated longer than western classical has even existed. Cæsar himself wrote of their great ability to learn and memorise.

Comparing modern popular music to popular music of antiquity (traditional music) is completely absurd because traditional music has been cultivated and developed and refined and practised for thousands of years while popular music is extremely new and has had no time to refine itself whatsoever. Traditional music has actually seen more development and change than classical music or popular music, which would not even exist without its roots in traditional music, which is the oldest form of music in our human history as old as stone age instruments like bone flute. You simply view art with a bias to literacy and what you're most familiar with, you cannot easily hear or study how traditional music has developed (ironically classical is more popular than traditional today and is extremely accessible in comparison, not requiring any archaeological study or extrapolation or guesswork to produce) because folk cultures are dead or dying and things like the music to ancient Greek plays will never be heard.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action