Is the cover ever better than the original?
no. the nin cover of johnny cash's hurt was atrocious
>>54153148XD
>>54153148kek
It can be.
>>54153125I've heard a few.Better is subjective.I like what Jesse Lacey put into his live covers of Accident Prone and Trailer Trash but I mean, the originals still have their own merits (especially accident prone)
>>54153125Leonard Cohen's cover of Jeff Buckley's Hallelujah was atrocious.
>>54153125Yes.Rhapsody's cover of Power of thy Sword is better than the original.Animetal's first cover of Zankoku na tenshi no these (the punk rock version) is better than the original.So is the bike horn cover.
>>54153125All along the watchtower
>>54153148underrated post.To add to this: No, David Bowie's cover of Nirvana's man who sold the world (live at mtv or unplugged version) was absolutely horrible.
>>54153125Yes actually, and I know you're not going to believe me when I say this, but the cover of Survivor from Alvin in the chipmunks 3 is actually better than the original song by Destiny's Child.Even if you don't like the high pitch, it's hard to deny that The Chipettes bring more intensity with their performance.I'm not at all kidding.
>>54153125https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1x_wNUmiFC4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X07EpBicKmk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UodDJEE49V0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jadvt7CbH1o
YEShttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xJWxPE8G2c
>>54154290shit used ti be my jam, ty based anon.