File: 154 KB, 449x449, dfhjghm.jpg [
Show reposts] Image reverse search: [
iqdb] [
google]
No.53099540 [
Reply] [
Original]
>animal collective is extremely overrated
>discography is a 3/10 at best
| >> | No.53100392 >>53100204 STGSTV creates this peaceful, yet kind of 'off' fantasy world with its music. The band is clearly young and hasn't mastered harmonies or a huge sound yet, but the album is extremely cohesive and features one if the greatest starting streaks of any band ever: (Beautifully serene yet creepy title track, the upbeat, rhythmic, spastic April and the Phantom, and the ear-piercing yet oddly hypnotizing Untitled). Also, the drums are fantastic.
Sung Tongs is overrated IMO. It was their softest (excluding Campfire Songs) album to date, and featured folk songs from every area of folk music. It had fantastic songs like Leaf House, yet wasn't that great as a full experience.
Feels only retained minuscule evidence of AnCo's previous eccentricity and abrasiveness, yet it was special in its own way. It was bright, big, and had some of the best melodies and structures of any AnCo release. The instrumentation is slightly odd, yet works with the diversity if the tracks. Extremely happy and listenable album.
There you go, faggot. |
| >> | No.53100880 >>53100807 Disclaimer that this is my opinion and not objective because I really don't want to take the time to critically analyse Spirit right now.
It's just not as good as /mu/ makes it out to be. It's a great album, but HCTI, Strawberry Jam, MPP, Feels, ST, are more varied, have more focused feeling and songwriting, don't invoke that retard emotional state /mu/ jizzes themselves over, they also have much better bass sounds (holy shit that Chocolate Girl bass sound on anything but fucking headphones.) It's good, but not incredible. |
| >> | No.53102064 >>53099774 You're asking dumb fucking people. Those exist in every fan base. I'm sure that there are a lot of people that listen to them to align themselves with a culture they want to be a part of, but that's besides the point. The reason they're good is because they've managed to show incredibly broad range in just about every aspect a musician could, but they also managed to present their eccentricities in a way that people can relate to. They are both intellectually and emotionally poignant.
They've written songs with both western and nonwestern scales and modes, they've explored all sorts of standard and poly-rhythms (there are plenty of arrhythmic songs as well), they've ventured into abrasion and soothing timbres, sometimes juxtaposing the two in highly unorthodox ways, they've constantly evolved their sound, their lyricism is both ambiguous and tangible, they're passionate performers, I could go on or provide examples, but I think they're totally respectable compared to most western musicians. The one thing they really don't excel in is technique, and only dumbasses don't recognize that musicians that define themselves by technique are more athletes than they are artists. Which is respectable in its own right, but not in a cerebral way. |