/mu/ - Music (Temp full images)

yeah cows are pretty cool

>>52660671
sure, but Meddle is better

Pink Floyd would disagree

I can tell you for sure that pic related is god tier

>>52660671

>2015
>still listening to Pink Floyd

The suite is overlong and drags on and on. Starts out great, though.
If is genuinely great, best track on the album.
Summer '68 is also a good track.
Fat Old Sun is okay, doesn't do much for me, but I can see if people like it.
Alan's Psychedelic Breakfast is a couple of comfy laid back jams interrupted by sounds of someone eating breakfast. Gets old and annoying real fast, some people even get disgusted by some of the sounds, like when he chokes on his cereal.

Overall, it's okay, but they did better stuff in their early years.

It would be their best if it weren't for the last track

More and Obscured By Clouds are my personal favorites

>>52660760
fuck off the floyd is timeless

>>52660760

>calls le self music fan
>not accepting Pink Floyd as an excellent band

>>52660875
>>52660879

I never said I didn't like em, but why would you still be listening to them?

Unless you're 12 and just discovered them, you should've already killed their discog.

There's so much new music, and older more unknown music that you can discover and listen to.

Pretty sure most people listened to all that 60s/70s psych/classic rock when they were 14-18.

Time for some new shit.

>>52661017
not everyone is you and as far as the musics concerned there will always be discussion for floyd because they made dark side, the greatest album ever

>>52661017
>implying you can't listen to music for enjoyment

>>52661017
So you do only ever listen to albums once? Never revisit old music?

>>52661042
>dark side, the greatest album ever
fucking kek

>>52661068
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecRcmwFhprc

>>52661068
it is, objectively

This is better than any shitty Pink Floyd album.

More psychedelic, too.

http://youtu.be/V6H4oaCkelE?t=3m09s

>>52661135
gr8 b8 m8

>>52661151
whatever you say, grandpa with outdated records

>>52660671
Summer 68 is jesus christ
best Wright song, best Pink Floyd song really

>>52661089
nice song, too bad almost everything else is dull

>>52661185
>best Wright song,
lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa8ywWvxcmc

>>52661201
>dull
lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjBXdaJeg-8

The Piper at the Gates of Dawn > Ummagumma > Meddle > Animals > Atom Heart Mother > Atom Heart Mother > The Dark Side of the Moon > A Saucerful of Secrets > Wish You Were Here > The Wall > shit > Everything else

>>52661042

no, but I'm only 23. Like I said, unless you're 12, you should've overkilled Floyd by now.

>>52661056

>implying you can't get bored of music

>>52661057

Read.

If you grew up listening to the classics:

Floyd, Zep, Beatles, Hendrix, etc.

they'd be boring by now, BECAUSE you listened to em more than once.

Sure, I revisit older music sometimes, but discussions on Floyd are pretty stale by now and I really don't have any interest in re-listening to them

>>52661203
fuck, good arguement, they're both god tier

>>52661127
gr8 b8 m8

>>52661246
underage detected

>>52661241
i nearly fell asleep

>>52661246
listening to music isnt a contest, idiot

>>52661244
Agree
Though I'd probably still rank DSoTM higher.

>>52661320
yeah, he's playing very melodic and beautifully

the music anything but dull, gilmours best album imo

>>52661246
congratulations for putting absolutely no soul or emotion into listening to music.

fucking droid

>>52661127

>objectively

hahahhahaha

>>52661386
contest it then

>inb4 any of your boring /mu/tant shite

>>52661321

not tryna make it one

Have you honestly not listened to Pink Floyd a million times when you were younger?

>>52661385

lol how do you even put soul into listening to music?

I listen to the music I want to listen to.

There's so much new music that is doing new and exciting things. I'll always respect Floyd for what they did, they're just not appealing or interesting to me anymore.

>>52661433
>contest it then
lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QLL2j8ZtxE

>>52661433
you sound dumb, underage, pleb, (insert adjective that describes your musical ignorance here)

>>52661433

you can't contest a subjective thing like a music opinion dumbass

>>52661493
>Have you honestly not listened to Pink Floyd a million times when you were younger?
no, because i wouldnt be able to appreciate the richness of the music til later in life, like you're suppose to

>>52661522

oh ok. well i wasn't a dumbass as a kid, so that explains it

>>52661433
but dark side of the moon is boring shite you fucking pleb

>>52661569
it has nothing to do with being a dumbass...

you clearly havent matrued enough or know about musical apperciation to the point where you can articulate what you like or dont like about certain music, like pink floyd

in short, dark side is literally too smart for you...

>>52661246
>implying you can't get bored of music
That doesn't mean you WILL get bored of music. Some music can be timeless to some people. It doesn't matter how long or how much you've listened to it.

>>52661592
What's boring about it?

>>52661608

lol i can articulate what i like about music, to an extent

there are some things you like that you can't explain why

Either way, that has nothing to do with the argument. I appreciated Floyd as a kid, and you're telling me I didn't. You sound smart

>>52661614

I mean, if you spent like 5-6 years in your teens listening to Floyd a good amount, there's a good chance that after that you'll be interested in broadening your horizons

if you still like Floyd because you havent listened much, or just discovered them, thats cool

but most people still talking about Floyd are some fardnugs holding onto the past that don't ever discover new music

>>52661738
>born in le rite generation!!

>>52661738
So I can't constantly be discovering new music while also revisiting old favorites? Wtf dude

>>52661799

generally when you look to discover new music, it's because you develop (or crave) a particular sound that's different than what you've heard in the past

do you not go through music phases?

>>52661738
>there are some things you like that you can't explain why
no, when i like something i isolate it and can articulate why i like it based on my study of music

>I appreciated Floyd as a kid, and you're telling me I didn't.
you cant fully apperciate floyd until you are an adult

idiot

>>52661874
What if I haven't heard Pink Floyd in the past? Then it is thus new music.

>>52661884

you're wrong about everything

your life is probably one big failure

>>52661950

>if you still like Floyd because you havent listened much, or just discovered them, thats cool

>>52661738
>if you spent like 5-6 years in your teens listening to Floyd a good amount
I didn't.
>there's a good chance that after that you'll be interested in broadening your horizons
That's what I've been doing since I was in my mid-late teens. It's not like every 18+ Pink Floyd fan was listening to nothing but Pink Floyd in their teen years.

>but most people still talking about Floyd are some fardnugs holding onto the past that don't ever discover new music
Most of those people are children/teenagers on youtube.

>>52661982
haha you're mad now...

well thats what you get for acting like a fucking basic bitch

pink floyd is too smart for you haha how dumb do you even have to be to not 'get' dark side...

>>52662013
Why is it not OK to like them, even if you have heard a lot of music?

>>52660671

Comeone Simeone!

Let me knowne if the tricci still onne.

>>52662072

When I was a little kid,
my father used to be a heroe,
his used to have a great eblow,
also he had a great backbone.

:PpPpPp

>>52662041

i didn't mean "like" I should've said "listen"

>>52662019

you clearly haven't been reading, son

>>52662174
Why is it not OK to listen to Pink Floyd, even when you've listened to a lot of other music?

>>52662205
no, i have

you listened to pink floyd when you were a baby and think now you have a real handle on the band, but actually dont know fuck-all and touting yourself like some big music expert when you're a basic bitch

>>52661246
yikes

is this like a deluxe reissue of dude ranch

>>52662213

that wasn't my point at all, my point was that if you're still listening to Pink Floyd in 2015, you probably don't listen to much music

that's because Pink Floyd is a hugely popular classic-rock band that most people hear when they're young and don't have many other musical options

>>52662319
why are you assuming because someone is young they dont have many outlets for music?

kill yourself faggot !

>>52662362

found the 12yo

usually when people are young, they're music tastes are limited to a few different artists

again >usually

don't lose your shit, bud

>>52662319
>Pink Floyd is a hugely popular classic-rock band that most people hear when they're young and don't have many other musical options
OK, sure. But wouldn't it be OK to listen to them once you've also discovered new music? Because the reality is that those people you are describing would have heard only a few Pink Floyd singles, and probably not albums like Ummagumma or Pipers.

>>52662386
what dont you like about the track breathe?

>>52662421

>the reality is that those people you are describing would have heard only a few Pink Floyd singles, and probably not albums like Ummagumma or Pipers.

not really, generally when people are only into a few artists, they scour their entire discog

im not saying its wrong to listen to em

but if you're willing to make a thread about em in 2015, you're most likely still jerking off over their music instead of getting on with the times

>>52660760
>>52661017
music is not affected by time, all music and all art forms are timeless.
also, you're a massive faggot.

>>52662463

lol now i know why you like Pink Floyd...you clearly have brain damage

i never said i didnt like their music

>>52662508
not eveyrone takes music in waves, some people just like it and listen to it all

>>52662519

one's tastes are effected by time, age, and frequency of listens

lrn2life

Totally agree with that 23 yo guy.
However, I discovered them at like 19 (family too snob to listen to pink floyd and I was more of a hip hop guy) and got more and more interested in more contemporary music after I got bored of it at 20-21. Like most of us.

I'm 23 too btw

>>52662508
>not really, generally when people are only into a few artists, they scour their entire disco
Not really, because by this logic, all Floyd albums would be bought/downloaded equally, as these people discover their discog. But that is not true, some of their albums are more popular than others. And by what is surely more than coincidence, those more popular albums are the eons that still get radio play to this day.,
>getting on with the times
OK then you are saying it's OK to listen to the new Pink Floyd album that was just released this year.

>>52662539
look, faggot, their music is timeless and most of their later works are very complicated and ingenius

just because you listened to them when you were younger doesnt mean that you've discovered everything about them

i bet you're not even an actual fan of their music, you read as some snob

Floyd is amazing.
Kek because people haven't realized a new album came out this year.

>>52662595
He never said that it wasn't complex/good.

He initially just said:
>2015
>still listening to pink floyd

He's right on that point

>>52662587

nah, man. Floyd albums would not be bought/downloaded equally because people can listen to music without buying it. You can listen to someones entire discog, without enjoying every album equally. Everyone has favourites

lol, its ok to listen to the new Floyd record, yes

but you're listening to the deteriorated minds of 3/5 members

if that's all you listen to or talk about, i feel bad for you

>>52662790
>Floyd albums would not be bought/downloaded equally because people can listen to music without buying it
Well I just addressed that by noting "downloaded". Furthermore, that can be tracked, which albums are downloaded more than others. Which, Darkside and The Wall and WYWH is.
>Everyone has favourites
Not relevant.
>lol, its ok to listen to the new Floyd record, yes
OK then what's the problem?
>but you're listening to the deteriorated minds of 3/5 members
Not relevant.
>if that's all you listen to or talk about, i feel bad for you
Well wait, you've spent the majority of this thread talking about it yourself.

>>52662889

no, you didn't address that

downloading isn't the only alternative to buying

you can stream

favourites are totally relevant. Most people only spend money on their favourite records

is this thread about the new record?

i havent been talking about em, Ive been talking about why you're a pleb

>>52663059
>no, you didn't address that
I did, read my post again. I specifically said "all Floyd albums would be bought/downloaded equally" here >>52662587
>downloading isn't the only alternative to buying
>you can stream
That is also trackable, and we can observe this phenomenon. Songs from Darkside have more plays/likes than songs from Obscured By Clouds.
>Most people only spend money on their favourite records
Read above.
>i havent been talking about em
Should I quote you each post where you talk about Pink Floyd?
>why you're a pleb
But yet someone who dismisses older music and vies towards newer music is a pleb.

>>52663167

Just because some albums have more listens, doesn't mean that the specific fans we are talking about don't generally listen to all their albums at least once

>Read above.

Above doesn't address the fact that people will buy their favourite records, doesn't mean they didn't listen to all Floyd. You can say that Dark Side has more views on YT, but that stupid logic. Lemme explain.

People are going to listen to their favourite records more than once! You can stream DS 300 times, and AHM 2 times. So the view count for this oen person would be 300 v 2. That doesn't mean that they didn't listen to AHM.

Flawed logic.

>Should I quote you each post where you talk about Pink Floyd?

I was being sarcastic. Here's actually what I said:

>if that's all you listen to or talk about, i feel bad for you
>if that's all you listen to or talk about
>all

>>52663360
>People are going to listen to their favourite records more than once!
Thus it is perfectly OK to listen to Pink Floyd at any time, contrary to what you've said all along.

>>52663421

lol, you really are stupid, eh?

You can listen to Pink Floyd 3000 times from the ages of 14-18

Doesn't mean that if you're still listening to that from 19-35+ you're any less of a pleb

>>52660760
>2010+5
>still has shit tier waifu
:DDDDD

>>52663421

but yea, glad i proved you wrong that you weren't able to respond to anything

rethink your life, I hope I've changed it

I'm done for the day

>>52663604
But I don't like Pink Floyd

>>52660671
nah, aside from alans psychedelic breakfast, it's shit, and even the bad says so.

>>52663563
[citation needed]

>>52663604
fight me
fucking fight me

i dare you to post your address and meet up with me right now bitch

i will come wherever you want me to bitch. i will fucking beat you up so bad.

fight me or die

This board is so fucking retarded

>>52664391
glad to have you with us :)

Typical fucking /mu/ listening to music for the image and not for the fucking music itself

>>52661518
>music
>subjective

>>52664559
How is he wrong?

>>52664799
>he doesnt know

>>52664856
>opinions aren't subjective!

>>52665521
>he thinks opinions are subjective

>>52660779
>but they did better stuff in their early years
AHM was pretty early man

>>52665774
In general, an opinion is a judgment, viewpoint, or statement about matters commonly considered to be subjective, i.e. based on that which is less than absolutely certain, and is the result of emotion or interpretation of facts. What distinguishes fact from opinion is that facts are verifiable, i.e. can be objectively proven to have occurred. An example is: "America was involved in the Vietnam War" versus "America was right to get involved in the Vietnam War". An opinion may be supported by facts, in which case it becomes an argument, although people may draw opposing opinions from the same set of facts. Opinions rarely change without new arguments being presented. It can be reasoned that one opinion is better supported by the facts than another by analyzing the supporting arguments.[1] In casual use, the term opinion may be the result of a person's perspective, understanding, particular feelings, beliefs, and desires. It may refer to unsubstantiated information, in contrast to knowledge and fact.

>>52661246
god you're autistic

>>52660671
That cow is looking at us

>>52665932
>he took the time to type this up

>>52666066
>he doesn't know he copied it from wikipedia