Is there a point to using What.cd if I just use rutracker? Does What.cd have more stuff?
> there are people who don't use slsk
Mostly the community, and the emphasis on quality control.
>>52478040>using what.cd for the community
get a exigo uh i mean e***o account :^)rutracker has a lot of stuff, but what.cd + slsk has a larger selection
>>52478054A community dedicated to cataloging and collecting a shit ton of music in amazing condition
>>52478088
>>52478054Is that Hampus? What's wrong with his face?
>>52478088>in amazing condition>digital files>in amazing condition
soulseek is all you'll ever need my friend
>>52478115He's finally reached the post-patrician realm.
Rutracker is way inferior for certain genres like classical and traditional folk. WhatCD has much more of everything, though definitely not absolutely everything like some people say. Its organisation is much better and no flac images.
>>52478144Where did it all go wrong...
>>52479656What's a "flac image" exactly?
>>52478002My life changed with soulseek
>>52478135>>52478088>>52477956Does what.cd have .wav files?
>>52481718wav is just uncompressed PCM, flac is losslessly compressed so there's no need for files that are way larger
No.52477956