Is this the logical conclusion to pop-punk?
>>51423509What?
>>51423509think you selected the wrong pic by mistake
>>51423509Jesus of Suburbia is a fucking masterpiece of Maximalist power pop, a whole album like this would be very praised by critics. it's basically what Titus Andronicus did but somehow their albums are taken much more seriously than American Idiot.
>>51423509girl at my school literally asks me>hey anon want to be in a punk band?>my influences are green day and Avril Lavine>*beings to bang head against wall.jpg
>>51423602Don't worry, you'll grow out of your "real punk" phase once you turn 18.
>>51423623but it's not real punk. i don't get it.
>>51423572all of my whatTwo totally different bands, only thing tying them together is being lumped into a fake, dead genre by other people.
>>51423572>i enjoyed it in hi skool, therefore it is good
>>51424599I was passing out while you were passing out your rules!
>>514246551 2 3 4 who's punk what's the score!
>>51423572Sorry, it's actually pop punk, not "power pop".
>>51423509Rise against is pop punk, sum 41 is somewhat pop punk, green day is debatable.
>>51423509>51423509no,cloud nothings are
>>51423509No, Musical bands don't form a logical argument and hence cant be or have a logical conclusion. Henceforth, given that, because of these circumstance, regarding our dearest friend we must conclude that this is shit posting and must then further conclude that I have wasted my time and my life.
>>51424712i was listening to this song when i read this post lol xd
>>51427422>catchy and pop-punk are the same thingdie in a fire
>>51423572Homecoming off the same album is similarly through composed and also superior