| >> | No.50497979 >>50497850 You *can* but that would effectively say that the artist doesn't feel that their time, labor, and various costs that go into making records (recording space, mastering, etc.) are valueless; which, while not unheard of, is still incredibly rare. >>50497880 It may be, but that does not override the artists' decision. >>50497893 >he/she should be making music because it's what they love to do, not because they can make money. Why can't it be both? Certainly the former is and *should* be the priority, but that's like insinuating a doctor should work pro deo for every patient. Again, technically not unheard of but incredibly rare. >>50497903 It's less of blaming big government for me, and more for acknowledging individual responsibility. |