[ cgl / con / g / mu / qa / w ] [ index / top / reports / FAQ / DAAS / IG / status / transparency / fuuka ] [ img-search ]
As Dark As My Soul Default Fuuka

/mu/ - Music (Temp full images)


View post   

File: 289 KB, 1340x575, green-door-studio.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47904673 No.47904673 [Reply] [Original]

wp _IS_ OP edition

post your work. soundclouds are okay. please keep it civil.

trigger words/phrases so far: generative music, waveform

>> No.47904694

how to crack ableton?

>> No.47904728

>>47904673
What DAW should I use
I'm a total nub btw

>> No.47904744

>>47904728
Max/MSP

>> No.47904783
File: 224 KB, 1280x800, audiomulch-screenshot-1[1].png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47904783

Any fans of AudioMulch here?

>> No.47904798

>>47904783
woah, that looks pretty cool. what's going on on the left and where it says metasurface? what are you doing there?

>> No.47904846

>>47904798
On the left is the patch builder where you can interconnect various sound generator/effects modules. You can take snapshots of various parameters and use the metasurface to jump to various parameters and any value inbetween if that makes sense.

>> No.47904865

>>47904846
that's really awesome. Do you have anything you've made with it I can listen to?

>> No.47904938

Does anyone have any recommendations or advice for buying a laptop for production?

I really want an SSD.

I was going to get a macbook but they only have 2 USB ports and seem pretty overpriced..

>> No.47904985

>>47904865
I have it on my other laptop which I use with an audio interface so I can just DI my guitar and modify the sound in real time, Fennesz style I guess. I haven't uploaded any complete tracks yet as I'm still getting my head around how everything works but I hope to get something uploaded soon. Here's a pretty cool but short example from someone else though:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=On4ssvRrKEU

>> No.47905027

>>47904985
That's pretty awesome. Do you listen to a lot of Fennesz? One of my friends told me that if I liked OPN I would like his stuff, is this true?

>> No.47905037

>>47904783
>>47904846
I want to try this

>> No.47905093

>>47905027
Yeah I'm a pretty big fan of the guy, seen him live a couple of times. His sound is a bit more glitchy than OPN, but I can see the similarities. Check out Endless Summer and Venice for a good introduction to his music.

>> No.47905114

>>47905093
Alright, sweet. Thanks mane.

>> No.47905159
File: 42 KB, 600x302, roland_tr909.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47905159

Is this the best drum machine or what?

>> No.47905179

>>47905037
Give it a try, there's a trial version on their website and cracked versions floating around on torrent sites. As well as the included modules, you can also load in any VST you like, it's a lot of fun.

http://www.audiomulch.com/download

>> No.47905195

>>47904728
i use Live 9 for producing, Pro Tools 7 for mixing/mastering

>>47905159
its maybe not the _BEST_, but it is a total classic. the sound of too many house and techno records to name.

for me, personally, it is the best.

>> No.47905225

>>47905179
but it won't save VST state like it does for it's proprietary components, will it?
>>47905159
>>47905195
that's nice but it's the oberhaim DMX
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKzWLUQizz8
just listen to how punchy they are

>> No.47905269

>>47905225
You can save the state/snapshots and save automations for VSTs like any other component.

>> No.47905318

>>47905159
I'm partial to the machinedrum but the 909 has got some delicious claps

>> No.47905502

>>47905159
I like the 808 kick more

>> No.47905503

I posted this question at the end of the last thread and didn't get much of a response.

I want to have a hardware synth that I can use to make pads and atmospheric ambient sounds, in the same family of those OPN uses. I also want to be able to make interesting arps and jazz fusion-esque leads like this guy makes (https://soundcloud.com/balmy) it needs to be polyphonic, the cheaper the better. Is the Blofeld my best choice?

Thanks.

>> No.47905525

>>47905225
The DMX doesn't sound like that straight out of the box though.

>> No.47905534

>>47905503
Yes.

>> No.47905544

>>47905525
well how do you justice drums then?

>> No.47905545

>>47905534
thanks mane

>> No.47905562

>>47905544
lots of compression including sidechaining. lots of saturation.

>> No.47905611

>>47905544
>>47905562
Even the 303 has its RAT. FX are as important as the source material.

>> No.47905636

has everyone had a second to check out Sugar Bytes Egoist?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scfsGmyM9oo

http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2014/06/29/sugar-bytes-intros-egoist-perfect-track-sketch-tool/#more-57628

>> No.47905838

>>47905636
I'd never ever use something like this. Doing the same things in my DAW seems much more flexible even if it'd take a lot more setting up.

I always try to find a way to do something natively in my DAW before using a VST tho.

>> No.47905861

Did anybody like those waveforms I posted last night?

>> No.47905873

>>47905861
I wasn't here. Post em again?

>> No.47905886

>>47904938
Get a thinkpad. Don't even think about buying a mac, because you won't be able to find good vsts (unless you pay for them).

>> No.47905921

>>47905886
I bought a (cheap) thinkpad. E540. It wouldn't turn on after a few months. It's being sent away ATM.

So now I want another laptop as my 'music' laptop while I use that one for everything else.

I guess shit happens but I don't trust them any more.

I always have problems with stability and cracks and pops and stuff (obviously with ASIO drivers) and have heard macs are way better. I don't really care about VSTS that much anyway. I tend to use inbuilt ableton stuff and a few bits of outboard gear I have laying around.

>> No.47905965
File: 1.98 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47905965

>>47905873
It was an old oscilloscope from the 50s.
My iPhone doesn't like to leave the pictures in the correct position for some reason.

This is a square wave through a resonator

>> No.47905973

>>47905921
It also had the most retarded touchpad I've ever seen. The whole thing clicks in making it unstable as fuck, it can shudder as you drag your finger across. Absolutely retarded design.

>> No.47905997

>>47905965
What kind of resonator?

>> No.47906002
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47906002

>>47905965
Rectified sine wave. I like to call it "the ass wave"

>> No.47906025

>>47905997
Polymoog resonator designed by the late Jurgen Hiable, and built by grove audio. It's great for running polysynths, organs, and guitar through.

>> No.47906087
File: 2.07 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47906087

>>47906002
Square wave through a resonant Moog filter.

>> No.47906114
File: 109 KB, 753x769, dw-rehoused-polymoog-resonator-cropped.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47906114

>>47906025
Is it just basically a 3 band EQ?

>> No.47906121

>>47906087
if you held your phone horizontally (so the screen is in landscape like a normal camera) when taking the photo, it'd upload the right way most likely.

>> No.47906147

>>47906114
It's like a three band EQ, but it consists of 3 resonant filters instead of passive filters. You can also switch the filters between low pass, band pass, high pass, and notch modes. Quite a bit more flexible than a 3 band EQ

>> No.47906176

>>47906121
Thanks, I've been wondering how to fix this for a while

>> No.47906185

>>47906147
Are they parallel? Do they all have to have the same type (LP, BP, HP)? It sounds fairly bizarre.

>> No.47906271

>>47906185
They are indeed parallel. And yes, all of the filter have to be in the same mode. I wish I could switch just the high filter into high pass, but I'm not complaining. It's wonderfully unique, it can make things sound like they're in a metal containers of various sizes, or it can make things sound brassy or choirlike.

>> No.47906302

>>47906271
Was emphasis just a resonance\Q setting? It seems like bandpass would be cool for formant and vocal like stuff.

>> No.47906377

>>47906302
Yep. Bob Moog liked to come up with silly names for resonance like emphasis, or Q.

You are correct in that it's very good for formant type sounds

>> No.47906415

>>47906377
I really want to make some kind of vocal synth. Maybe with a ribbon controller a few euro modules and some expression pedals.

Here's the Voder. A voice synth from 1939.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hyI_dM5cGo

>> No.47906452

>>47906415
Definitely go with the doepfer ribbon controller, then you can use the pressure sensitivity for vibrato or brightness. Also, reverb is very good for a convincing vocal synth. It kind of hides the precision of a synthesizer.

>> No.47906459

>>47905159
it changed everything and practically reinvented electronic music, but I prefer the sound of the 707

>> No.47906476

>>47906415
I just about fell out of my chair when he asked her to play "greetings everybody" in the high voice

>> No.47906626
File: 136 KB, 1896x748, therevox-e1379602153986.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47906626

>>47906452
I think the hard part would be figure out how to set it up.

I was thinking ribbon for pitch. Pedal 1 for amplitude. Pedal 2 for formant frequency (I might need 2-3 controllers for this alone though). Then maybe a keyboard or some other controller for different kinds of source audio (I think the voder used different kinds of buzzing sounds).

Then just spend a few years learning how to play it.

>> No.47906725

>>47906476
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muCPjK4nGY4

Here's a similar idea using a piano, spectral analysis and a shit load of solenoids.

>> No.47906806

>>47906725
Lol, a little creepy, but still cool.

My university had a guy come to do some workshops on music robots. One of the robots he made was a singing robot that consisted of speakers mounted to helmholtz resonators to simulate the vocal formants. I wish I had a video to post, but nada.

>> No.47906864

>>47906806
Yeah man, that sounds right up my alley. Wish I coluld see it.

>> No.47907197
File: 160 KB, 1600x1062, $T2eC16hHJGkE9no8jDqpBRGk1mESYg~~60_57.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47907197

>> No.47907216

>>47907197
>tfw no overrated polysynth

>> No.47907264

>>47907216
Just get a Juno 106

>> No.47907271
File: 1006 KB, 3264x2448, yamaha-cs80-542447.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47907271

>>47907216
( ._.)

>> No.47907288

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=260MLsqtWVA
What's that thing that he uses to change his voice and can you get this type of effect in real time with just a DAW software?

>> No.47907314
File: 235 KB, 2340x831, Juno106_LxHP_TopFrnt1.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47907314

>>47907264
How many voice chips can there be left in the world?

>> No.47907379

>>47907288
A vocoder? There are lots of software vocoders.

It'd be possible to make those kind of sounds with a DAW some clever programming and an inbuilt or cheap mic if you don't wanna spend money.

They can be tricky to set up but there's lots of good stuff on google.

>> No.47907406

Can anyone recommend a good synth for making some neat fucked up stereolabby noises? As in, not so musical, but with lots of parameters

>> No.47907423
File: 166 KB, 970x411, Yamaha_DX1_front_view_1[1].jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47907423

>>47907314
Considering there are already clones of these voice chips, enough forever

Speaking of polysynths, I wish I had pic related

>> No.47907613

>>47907264
>tfw no overrated polysynth with fewer features

>> No.47907616
File: 117 KB, 500x407, rich.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47907616

>>47905159

The 909 is sick, no doubt. It really grooves and breathes. Did you know that it's all of the drums are analog, along with the closed hi-hat, but that the signature open hat, crash, and ride are digital samples? That's why they have the tuning knobz. And some people mod their 909s to tune up the open hat sample, too.

The sound of the 909 is "played out" as far as unce-unce-unce is concerned, but people have barely scratched the surface when it comes to shifting the sample rate of the kick and snare. The sound of that is unbelievably punchy.

My personal favorite drum machine is the TR-707. It's much cheaper than the 909, though these days, prices are continually getting BTFO on ebay. About six years ago, you could get a 707 on ebay for a couple hundred bucks. Same with the 606.

The 707 has the same crash and ride sample as the 909, but the rest are all woody acoustic drum samples. And it has its weird latin counterpart, the 727, with congas and glockenspiels and chimes and shit. This tune uses those samples pretty heavily, and is like the ultimate drum machine anthem anyway:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vrvdPRLeEU

OK, sorry to ramble, but not really, because I love drum machines.

The 606 is an awesome machine, too. It has the same enclosure as the 303, so the two naturally go together. However, it has a really, really soft and low kick. It doesn't cut very well. The hats on it cut hard. They are super noisy and tinny. And the snare is like the little brother to the 808.

The 808 is GOAT, objectively speaking. That thing is still rocking today. Hell, there is the entire genre of trap music, which is basically just an 808 that's been resampled over 9000 times, then pitched around to make basslines. 808's are so damned expensive, and rightly so. You're looking at a 100% analog drum circuit in a brickhouse enclosure and a true piece of history.

Clones like the Acidlab Miami are affordable and awesome.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_luuZVmURI

>> No.47907636

>>47907423
Why? It's basically just 2 DX7s. I'd be much happier with a TX-816 and a Jellinghaus

>> No.47907922

>>47907636
for the looks, obviously

>> No.47907948

>>47907616

>but people have barely scratched the surface when it comes to shifting the sample rate of the kick and snare.

I mean sampling the kick and snare into ultrabeat or something and pitching them around.

>> No.47908618

>>47905159
808 for life niqqa

>> No.47908847

>>47904728
anything that makes you feel good while working. Getting stuck in DAW-wars is a waste of time, but it can be daunting to pick one to start out with. I would recommend downloading a demo or pirating any of the big-name DAWs and trying them out, checking out some tutorials on youtube and getting a feel for whatever seems nice. People have made big money on whatever software, more than any person on this board will make probably, so don't worry about it. Its like if chefs would argue with each other which kitchen is the best to cook in.

>> No.47908874

>>47907948
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EypmRwr_rs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9d5HfGrfG8

it's not that new an idea tbh

>> No.47908910

>>47905965
those look really fucking nifty

>> No.47909001
File: 106 KB, 568x869, 1402885673841.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47909001

>>47908874

Holy hell, I hear Luke Vibert playing that first tune live all the time, but never could find it... thanks for sharing.

>> No.47909015

>>47908910
It's handy for DIY stuff, but it's also really fun to kick it on just to see what different processes to to waveforms.

Also, most square waves do not look anything close to their graphical representation

>> No.47909027

>>47909001
yeah i think dynamix II did stuff on breakin' records (ed dmx's label) in the 90s

>> No.47909398

>>47909015
do sine waves look like what they're supposed to look like?

>> No.47909425

>>47909398
Yep. Otherwise it won't be a sine. But a perfect square is impossible to create, it's impossible to instantaneously jump from one voltage to another.

>> No.47909760

>>47909425
Perfect anything is impossible to create if you're measuring hard enough.

>> No.47910031

>>47909760
except for a perfect sine wave which confirms sine wave for god tier waveform >>47909425
and sqaure for bin tier

>> No.47910060

>>47910031
Dude, don't you have a guitar general to post Froosh reaction images in?

>> No.47910087

>>47910060
>guitars
stay on topic please

>> No.47910141

>>47910031
Actually, a perfect sine isn't possible to be produced by a saw or triangle core VCO anyways. The closest you'll get is a test signal generator.

>> No.47910165

>>47910141
>a saw or triangle core VCO
is that the usual fare for synth construction?
why do they do this if so?

>> No.47910179

>>47910087
Again, don't you have a guitar general to post Froosh reaction images in? I never brought up guitars, even though they're perfectly on topic when it comes to production.

>> No.47910243

>>47910165
A saw or triangle core just means how the oscillator behaves. A tri core is good for FM, a saw core is good for wave shaping into other waveforms. A square core is known as a DCO. The best analogy for a sine core is a tube testing oscillator, which are pretty as at generating sines anyways.

Whatever core it is, it doesn't mean that's the only wave it produces, it's just the basic waveform generated, wave shapers are involved to produce other waveforms.

>> No.47910264

>>47910243
Are pretty ass*

>> No.47910278

>>47904673
free field recording/noise/power electronics album out soon

>> No.47910317

>>47910243
How do waveshapers work? Are they basically just filters or saturators?

>> No.47910464

>>47910243
is there any reason sinusoidal motion not the simplest behavior for oscillator design though? or if that's a misguided question, are sine cores relatively rare in [non-modular?] synth construction?
>>47910264
and so what actually would be the best method for generating analog sine waves?
>>47910179
>im not bringing up guitars
>keeps bringing up guitars
pls quit shitposting in these threads

>> No.47910557

>>47910464
opamp feedback is pretty cheap

>> No.47910640

>>47910464
There aren't any sine core VCOs. I know you're on some sort of quest to prove that sines at the best, but they're not. At least they never will be in the analog domain. If you start with a sine , you can only end with a sine. The best way would be to use a saw core VCO with a sine waveshaper. Or a self oscillating VCF. They'll both be sonically uninteresting enough to do what you want. I'm not sure why at all you're interested in analog sines, it's usually a synth noob obsession where they think they need perfect sines.
>>47910317
Sines are made by filtering
Squares by a comparator

>> No.47910754

What free resources you guys like to use?

https://soundcloud.com/ryunocore/sonatina-adventure

This was made with Sonatina Symphonic Orchestra, a free orchestral library in SF2/WAV formats.

I also love the early versions of dBlue's plugins (Crusher, TapeStop).

>> No.47910767

>>47910464
>king of shitposting in these threads telling other people not to shitpost

>> No.47910783

>>47910640
>I know you're on some sort of quest..
really only curious. unless you're running synth->wax it all gets squeezed to 0's & 1's anyway so i gave up my qualms about generating my sine bangers 100% ITB long time ago

>> No.47910951

>>47910783
>0's & 1's
That doesn't change anything. It's still non-advantageous to generate sines in an analog system. At least digital offers processing of many many sines and processes that actually make them interesting.

Unless you're a robot, it's all getting converted to analog anyways.

>> No.47911002

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKXuTHv5088

I don't normally care for Jordan Rudess videos, but this is amazing.

>> No.47911157

>>47910951
>It's still non-advantageous to generate sines in an analog system.
To explain this a little more clearly, the way subtractive synthesis works is to remove harmonics from a complex waveform. Sines have no harmonics, a filter is simply a volume knob for them.

>> No.47911203

>>47911002
lol, I just found out he's 56, that's incredible

I wonder if he's still able to pick up chicks with that stupid beard

>> No.47911315

>>47911203
nvm, he's married

>> No.47911465

>>47910754
my years worth of web-diving for free sample packs and plugins

TAL have the best free plugins IMO

>> No.47911491

>>47911157
what kind of filter would you use to turn a sawtooth into a sine wave?

>> No.47911547

>>47911491
Why would anyone do that?

>> No.47911550

just uploaded tonight

https://soundcloud.com/raffle-shindig/madeleine-by-damo

>> No.47911552

>>47911491
any lowpass filter will do

>> No.47911601

>>47911465
>TAL
this guy gets it.

>> No.47911711

>>47911552
how many dB/O should it be?

>> No.47911757

>>47911711
48 will cut off harmonics at a much faster rate than a 12db/o filter, and if you want to remove all the overtones then a more extreme filter will do. so a 48db/o filter.

>> No.47911767
File: 86 KB, 500x500, Jay_Electronica_Style_Wars_Ep-back-large.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47911767

https://soundcloud.com/samrihiphop/alone

>hiphop
>produced by me
>im first verse

>> No.47911768

>>47911711
24 would be preferred. Also good keytracking and self oscillation when you crank the resonance.

>> No.47911881
File: 223 KB, 1920x1080, pix.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47911881

My latest track:
https://soundcloud.com/lucasle/milky
>Chopped up guitars
>Massive(the vst)
>Funky breaks

>> No.47911918

>>47910951
>It's still non-advantageous to generate sines in an analog system. At least digital offers processing of many many sines
agreed, once you convert to bits by writing to any digital format there is no more distinction between 'this was fully made on a computer' and 'this was made on a fully analog circuit path'

>Unless you're a robot, it's all getting converted to analog anyways.
well if you mean you will only ever hear tunes as a result of them passing through a non-discretized physical realm, then sure. but then it could be argued you're not going to hear music as intended either because of the immeasurable and nonreplicable conditions between the artist's listening environment and the audience's listening environment, so it's a futile point to argue.

>> No.47912189
File: 223 KB, 800x600, 404763d1403862513-summer-namm-roland-unveils-free-sh-101-plug-out-synth-aira-system-1-image_01_l[1].jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47912189

So, the System 1 SH101 plug out emulator - good or bad? Will it be bought up by BoC-wannabes?

>> No.47912302

>>47912189
>doesn't even have midi
why would anyone buy this?

>> No.47912306

>>47912189
Bad
Yes

>> No.47912312

>>47905159
606 or gtfo, though all Roland drum machines are cool

>> No.47912358

>>47912189
>no LCD display
>only 4 voice polyphony

what they've done with system 1 is made a digital synth with literally no benefits of being a digital synth.

roland, when will they ever learn?

>> No.47912391

>>47912358
Lol, the microkorg was already made 11 years ago roland

>> No.47912592
File: 207 KB, 907x736, 9.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47912592

https://soundcloud.com/mephisto_waltz/atmospheric-beasts

>> No.47912601

>>47912189
It'd be much better if they did plug-outs of better synths. They could do a Minimoog. Call it the Minimeeg to get past copyright issues or something.

>> No.47912657
File: 154 KB, 1077x808, asdf.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47912657

Got my new desk today, now I just have to put my racks in the rack mount.

>> No.47912789

>>47912657
>slim phatty
Nice taste, I still miss mine.

>> No.47913134

>>47912601
Knowing roland, they'd probably try to clone the Minitmoog or the Taurus II, just because nobody wants them.

>> No.47913190
File: 134 KB, 1032x616, system-1.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47913190

you can tell it will sound better than a 101, just look at it

it looks cleaner and brighter somehow, i can't tell what they changed

but i think the old 101 was looking a bit tired after 10 years, it needed an update

>> No.47913202

Is a spring reverb just a spring inbetween an input and output jack or is there more to it than that?

>> No.47913232

>>47913202
Google is your friend.

>> No.47913278

>>47913232
You can just admit you don't know.

>> No.47913284

>>47913190
umm.. what?

>> No.47913310

>>47913202
basically that, but with a magnetic pickup that picks up the sound

simply running it through a coil won't give it a reverb effect.

>> No.47913318

>>47913278
No I don't really, although I have a good idea. If I really wanted to know, I'd Google it. There are also these great sites like Wikipedia that can tell you almost anything about any subject.

>> No.47913338

>>47913202
Nope. There needs to be something to drive the spring, and something to amplify the return.

Check out this thread to get a good idea:
https://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=95996&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0&sid=7d467a243b38e33c78b341f241d80ccf

>>47913284
I think he's making a joke about the type of person who would be all over the System-1

>> No.47913366

>>47913318
Well we can stop making these threads then now. Hooray.

>> No.47913388

>>47913338
i mean seriously is there anyone who will be saying that

what the fuck are they doing, it looks like a skrillex prop from tron legacy 6

>> No.47913427

>>47913388
Gaia owners

Appealing to their target market, i e, the people who loved skrilks and tron legacy

>> No.47913461

>>47913388
My only issue with the design is that they threw away mod and pitch wheels for that gimmicky scatter thing. I guess the green is pretty gross as well but no one seemed to have an issue with that on the tr8.

>> No.47913463

>>47913190
is this guy serious

>> No.47913481

>>47913232
yeah, I mean why would we talk about such a thing in a production thread on the music board of 4chan

>> No.47913485

>>47913338
oh

10/10

>> No.47913557

>>47913485
Spring reverb circuits used to be particularly nasty in the days of only tube circuits. There was usually a pair of tubes dedicated solely for that purpose, one for power amplification, one for return preamplification.

>not valves

>> No.47913601

>>47913481
That's not talking production though, it's being lazy and expecting to be spoonfed.

Asking what people's opinions are of spring reverbs would be a good way to start a conversation.

>> No.47913618

Can someone halp pls.

http://clyp.it/tdud5rgj

So I found this in a sample pack and I'm absolutely in love with the timbre. Does anyone know where I'd find something like that? It sounds like some old school sample-based or wavetable synth.

Thx.

>> No.47913641
File: 1.70 MB, 2000x1500, gallery_4[1].jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47913641

spring reverbs are fuckin awesome

>> No.47913654

>>47913618
wtf dude, it's a Rhodes piano, the clue is in the name.

>> No.47913672

>>47913601
Oh so it's only 'talking production' if you're asking for peoples opinions on gear they probably haven't even used.

>> No.47913682

http://www.accutronicsreverb.com/main/?skin=sub03_01.html

Here's a good read. Turns out Laurens Hammond pioneered the use of spring reverb for music. I consider myself this board's Hammond nut, and I didn't even know this, though I knew about the bizarre necklace reverb created by some of his engineers.

>> No.47913714

>>47913672
>probably haven't even used a spring reverb
pfhahahahahaha

>>47913618
Pretty sure that's a wurlitzer wavetable based LA piano patch, from their classic DX70

>> No.47913732

what's your opinion of wavelet synthesis?

>> No.47913733

>>47913682
Bell Labs invented everything to do with sound, I swear.

>> No.47913767

>>47913654
It's obviously not just a simple rhodes if you listen to it. It has a very interesting clicky and plucky sound in it that make it sexy ashelll.

>> No.47913775

>>47913733
I know right? I bet if I pulled some of my notes out, I'd find that I wrote Bell Labs in there like 1000 times.

>> No.47913782

>>47913767

It sounds very DX7-like

>> No.47913786
File: 182 KB, 1200x520, dsi_mono_evolver_lg.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47913786

>tfw no qt mono evolver

>> No.47913787

>>47913767
That's a tambourine.

>> No.47913793
File: 104 KB, 720x960, Wicked town doodle.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47913793

>>47904673
green door!! fellow weegie. just recorded some loops on my loop pedal if anyone fancies a listen. I made a sort of demo pack of soundss https://soundcloud.com/swinginmables/guitar-demos/s-MvWv8

>> No.47913813

>>47913782
I don't think it's Bell-like enough to be a DX7, I think it might be a plugin with a keyclick parameter turned way up

>> No.47913839

>>47913714
DX70? By chance do you mean the DX7?

Also I did some googling for L.A. piano and this website http://www.synthmania.com/Famous%20Sounds.htm says that it's a mix of an FM rhodes and a regular piano, but that's not exactly what the sample I posted sounded like...idk.

>> No.47913849

>>47913732
I thought that was a typo of wavetable at first.

Doing basic homework, it seems to be more useful for modulation or research than it does for actually making music.

>> No.47913888

>>47913839
It was a joke.

Wurlitzer: Competing electric piano
Wavetable: Because he (you?) said wavetable
L.A. Piano: Linear Algorithmic Piano (piano patches from the Roland D-50)
DX-70: Combination of DX7 and D-50

>> No.47913904

>>47913888
Very clever.

>> No.47913916

Why do synth jokes always end up getting so awkward

>> No.47913919

>>47913732
Are we talking granular modulating to less than a single cycle?

>>47913714
Everyone has used a spring reverb. I mean all of the opinions about rare vintage and unreleased gear i see all of the time.

Google has plenty of useless opinions too.

>> No.47913950

>>47913775
What are your notes? Just cool bits and bobs about gear and production you've saved?

>> No.47913961

why is is better to use monitors/speakers when producing music over using headphones?

>> No.47913968

>>47913916
because we're all lonely men who don't get a lot of social interaction

>> No.47913969 [DELETED] 
File: 67 KB, 868x547, Screen Shot 2014-06-30 at 3.48.13 PM.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47913969

Go on RYM and find the silliest user ratings page you can find.

I'll start.

>> No.47913974

>>47913961
better bass response

>> No.47913976

>>47913888
You have the worst sense of humor holy shit.

>> No.47913977
File: 10 KB, 319x316, ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°).jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47913977

>>47913786
>monosynths

>> No.47913985
File: 3.07 MB, 3264x2448, Modular Cat.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47913985

>>47913916
Because nobody gets them.

>> No.47914001

>>47913974
I thought it had more to do with spacial perception and phase relationships.

>> No.47914005

>>47913961
Diffusion

>> No.47914017

>>47914001
That too

>> No.47914026

>>47913919
not less than, exactly
it's a transform, more similar to fft than granular really
but you could idly describe it that way if you missed out the analyisis part

>> No.47914031

>>47913976
Jesus christ, get over yourself.

>> No.47914038

>>47913976
Somebody has sand in their vagina

>> No.47914039

>>47913916
>>47913968 is correct

>>47913969
no

>>47913961
increased frequency response, specifically in the lows. second, phase and stereo imaging. its better and you can get more accurate mixes on a pair of good monitors (in a tuned room, of course) than you can on a set of headphones.

>> No.47914043

>>47914005
showing your next door neighbours your wubz go harder than theirs

>> No.47914054

>>47913961
It's what Terry Pratchett calls "lies-to-children". You can produce, mix and master on headphones just fine, but most people would just buy shitty/uneven stuff, so it's easier to tell them "no, bad puppy" than to explain they need to learn what frequency response actually is before you buy anything you use for work.

Add ear fatigue to the mix and you have a meme, Dawkins definition: an idea that spreads itself, even if the carrier of the virus doesn't understand what it means either.

>> No.47914063

>>47914031
It's just the internet pal. Calm down.

>> No.47914064
File: 64 KB, 600x800, Brab4qYCAAAiwb0.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47914064

>tfw you dont have John Mayer's studio

>> No.47914078

>>47914054
You sound like a cool dude

>> No.47914097

>>47914063
ditto

>> No.47914111
File: 265 KB, 1181x788, studio+vangelis[1].jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47914111

>>47914064
Nope. Still don't want to be John Mayer.

>> No.47914118

>>47914064
Just a P12 man. I mean, I'm sure he has some cool kit, but it's not über expensive or magical like an Obie 8 voice or a GX-1 or some shit.

>> No.47914121

>>47914078
Thank you.

>> No.47914135

>>47914111
>>47914118
synth jokes dont work

>> No.47914151

anyone have any basic tutorials for ableton? im still learning most of the stuff off of dubspot

>> No.47914153

>>47914039
Is an increased frequency response different to an even frequency response (which I thought good headphones could provide)?

>> No.47914155

>>47914054
there are also the phase issues

>> No.47914162

>>47914111
P10 (best prophet)
Jupiter 4 (best jupiter, fuck your 8)
Promars
CS-80 (pretty much the guy who made it cool)
24" color TV

Nigga had it made

>> No.47914170

>>47914135
TBF that was hardly a jok

>> No.47914182

>>47914135
Where the hell was the joke?

>> No.47914204

>>47914155
That's a possibility, but phase issues are really rare working ITB.

>> No.47914224

Stereo spread also sounds a lot different through speakers than through cans.

>> No.47914235

>>47914064
>>47914111
You know what, I don't even want to be those guys or have all that gear. I just need some place quiet to work.

>> No.47914256

>>47914235
>tfw no huge empty quiet building in the middle of nowhere to just get work done

>> No.47914262

>>47914182
Your life is the joke

>> No.47914278

>>47914262
>tfw

>> No.47914286

>>47914153
increased frequency response typically refers to your monitors being able to reproduce frequencies that some cannot produce, usually in the low end. ideally, you want something that covers the whole range of human hearing (and more) which is 20Hz-20KHz.

ideally, yes. you want a perfectly balanced frequency response as, theoretically, a mix done on "perfect" speakers would make it a lot easier for you to translate your mix onto different playback devices like iPods, hifi stereo setups, etc.

of course, that matters the most when youre working in a tuned mixing suite/room. if youre mixing in your apartment...you could spend time /money on other things first.

>> No.47914291

What separates an interesting sound from a boring one?

Is there anything quantifiable about it?

>> No.47914299
File: 68 KB, 636x338, pek_page.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47914299

>>47913977
>tfw no qt poly evolver

>> No.47914311

>>47914204
i meant speaker to speaker

>> No.47914332

>>47914291
>What separates an interesting sound from a boring one?
The way the composer uses it. Hammond organs are full of incredibly dull sounds, yet sound incredibly alive when played by the correct person.
>Is there anything quantifiable about it
nope

>> No.47914340

>>47914291
>What separates an interesting sound from a boring one?

The player

>> No.47914343

>>47914291
honestly? personal preference.

i could listen to Basic Channel for days; i find their sounds extremely interesting. not everyone does, though.

IMO a good sound is something that makes you go "what the fuck was that?" when you hear it. a good sound is something new.

>> No.47914364

>>47914291
Quantifiable? No. Statistical? Yes.

Interesting is what resonates with people, or things they can associate with something else. FM pitch-drop square patches through a vocoder are popular because they speak, for example.

>> No.47914365

>>47914299
I played a poly evolver once. It was everything I could have hoped it to be. If anybody here ever becomes loaded, you owe it to yourself to get an evolver, because it's truly unique in a world of samey analog polys.

That said, I haven't tried the P12, so it might cover the same territory.

>> No.47914379

>>47914170
>>47914182
you are right. bad joke. sincere apologies.

>> No.47914404
File: 74 KB, 438x490, 1402113852865.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47914404

>>47914256
>tfw no dinky studio apartment in the middle of the bustling city, crammed full head to toe with a multitude of wire cables and hardware attached to dozens of keyboards, synths, amps and the like surrounding your bed like you are living in a miniature studio 24/7

>> No.47914419

>>47914343
>something that makes you go "what the fuck was that?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHi6LjKuNl4

>> No.47914458

>>47914404
I'm too afraid of my shit getting stolen. I've already got a multitude of wire cables and hardware attached to dozens of keyboards, synths, amps, and the like. The problem is that I have no goddamn room anymore.

>> No.47914469

>>47914404
>tfw even if i had all of that gear i would still just spend my day masturbating, getting into pointless internet arguments and planning what to buy next

>> No.47914471

>>47914404
I built my PC so I can compose in bed all day long, and sometimes I mount up the controllers for maximum comfy.

My legs and back are killing me though, so I suggest everyone who thinks of doing that should also get physical activity at some point in the day.

>> No.47914484

>>47914419
Sounds like south africa 2010

>> No.47914510

>>47914469
already there man. already there

>> No.47914543

>>47914471
I propped all my stuff on some crates on a table in my basement cause I like standing

>> No.47914556

i only have an mpk and i have $200. Whats another piece of basic hardware i should buy?

>> No.47914583

>>47914556
An audio interface
Monitors
A decent dynamic mic

>> No.47914607

>>47914556
Headphones? A field recorder? Microphone?

What kind of music do you make?

>> No.47914620

>>47914543
>I like standing
So do I. But because I played music while standing so often, I developed an issue where blood has trouble returning from my legs. It doesn't cause any physical harm other than a pain I don't want to describe where. Now I have to sit on a bench when I play. Shit sucks so much.

>> No.47914882

Just got my ac adapter in the mail for my er-1. I was running it on a 200Ma adapter and it kept rebooting in the middle of everything. Works great now though.

>>47914404
;_;

I can dream

>> No.47914902

I like it here so I'm going to get this out of the way: how long until collabs happen and we stop liking each other and accusing people of stealing patches?

>> No.47914910
File: 227 KB, 422x361, Unbenannt.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47914910

Just finished a new track. Tell me what you think.

>Drum and Bass

https://soundcloud.com/monol1th/other-memory

>> No.47914923

how the fuck do i get that bass sound that all the hip hop producers are using these days?

i feel like i have an edge on these fucks because i actually know how to play instruments and i'm a good composer but sound design is so fucking alien to me and i just want le heavy bass

>> No.47914940

>>47914923

What kind of bass? Post an example.

>> No.47914952

>>47914923
TR808, need some samples?

>> No.47914971 [DELETED] 

>>47914940

https://soundcloud.com/teamsesh/laymeintheriver

>>47914952

if you've got some i would definitely appreciate

>> No.47915049

>>47914940

posted the wrong song the first time my bad

meant something maybe more like this

http://yungsimmie.bandcamp.com/track/wood-grain-grippin-prod-by-djsmokey

>>47914952

samples alone? i'd graciously take anything you have to offer

>> No.47915086

>>47914910
could use more variation on that little chirp every measure

>> No.47915099

>>47914923
Playing instruments doesn't count for much in electronic music. Composition usually counts for less than sound design.

Why not just go play in a band?

>> No.47915105

>>47915049
Sounds like a sampled or modified TR-808

>> No.47915119

>>47915099

clinically depressed which means socially retarded

also i work 80 hours a week and only have time to work behind a computer

>> No.47915147

>>47915049
https://www.dropbox.com/s/05lyt78fujvlfgu/808%20bass.zip
Sharing is caring.

>> No.47915153

>>47914607
mainly techno, some house as well

>> No.47915158

>>47915119
Being in a band will make you happier though.

Just make a shitty punk band brah.

>> No.47915198

>>47915153
Get a decent soundcard, studio monitors and some acoustic treatment for your studio room.

That's your # 1 prio.

Everything else can be done in the box (that is, the computer).

You can expand with hardware once you learn the software and get a feel for what you're missing.

>> No.47915214

>>47915198
cheers man

>> No.47915228

>>47915147

thanks for caring

one more question if you don't mind... when i arrange a couple in my sequencer, sometimes they ring out too long and so a couple of them will overlap, is there anything to be done about this?

>> No.47915233

>>47914923
Install NI Massive.
so far the best softsynth to generate basslines with working only with waveforms.
3 oscillators
2 mixer channels
etc.

There are basically no limits for what you can do with this synth. It's kind of hard to get into if you aren't used to synths, but it's worth it.

>> No.47915270

>>47915153
>>47915198

Soundcard is correct.
Instead of studio monitors get semigood studio headphones, eg beyerdynamics.

Extremely important : midi/usb keyboard

>> No.47915274

>>47915228
If the same sample is ringing out change the polyphony\voices\whatever to 1.

If you have 2 different sounds that are overlapping there may be a choke function so that one will silence the other (Ableton definitely has this).

>> No.47915319

>>47915228
Look into ADSR, you're going to need to learn that sooner or later. If you're on FL Studio, for example, assuming you loaded them on a Sampler channel, get rid of the decay and release, rev up the sustain and program the hits on the piano roll so the notes there are exact representations of the duration.

>> No.47915321

>>47915274
but ableton also has a native 808 drum

>> No.47915351

>>47915274

the polyphony thing totally worked. much obliged, anon

>> No.47915362

>>47915321
Which I believe is just an Operator patch which will have an option for polyphony.

>> No.47915382

>>47915321
Ableton's native shit is pretty uninteresting, though. I think the only thing I ever liked from it was Operator.

Meanwhile, Bitwig is just delicious.

>> No.47915432

>>47915319

>0 decay, 0 release, 10 sustain

neat. thanks anon. seems like i lost some attack in the process though :(

>> No.47915475

>>47915382
Bitwigs e-drums are pretty cool but I still prefer making them in something like Operator.

I'll go back to it if they ever follow through with the unified modulation system.

I couldn't even use timbre or velocity to control hat decay.

All I want is freely assignable LFOs, envelopes and velocity\timbre.

>> No.47915512

>>47914364
>Statistical? Yes.
>FM pitch-drop square patches through a vocoder are popular because they speak
how about a statistical reason instead of a qualitative one?
>>47914291
>Is there anything quantifiable about it?
you could probably go pretty far in an effort to classify different sounds and the "emotions" or "aesthetics" they elicit. you might even be able to get to the point where you can generate timbres based on #feeltags alone but in the end you'd still be left to what you trained your classifier on: peoples' subjective interpretations. best thing to do imo is just cut your loses, head for the most minimal approach, and turn all your parts into sine waves.

>> No.47915538

>>47915432
You shouldn't have, check the attack settings and keep them as short as possible.

>> No.47915574

>>47915512
>how about a statistical reason instead of a qualitative one?
I gave you a reason: the majority of people love sounds they resonate with, that make them think of something else that can be associated with it. It's the whole idea behind sound design.

>> No.47915598

>>47915574
Where are your statistics?

>> No.47915634

>>47915574
>he majority of people love sounds they resonate with, that make them think of something else that can be associated with it. It's the whole idea behind sound design.
unless you're literally resonating the people's molecules with your sound design i don't think you know what the word "statistical" means

>> No.47915641

>>47915538

so zero the attack nob too?

>> No.47915654

>>47915512
I cant, I have statisticular cancer

>> No.47915671

>>47915634
>iterally resonating the people's molecules
technically he would be

>> No.47915695

>>47915641
Always a good idea.

>> No.47915902

>>47915695

cool

now pitching them is proving to be a bitch

>> No.47916094

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/11682568/big%20in%20japan.ogg

look what I found browsing patches

>> No.47916158

>>47915902
would you prefer if we made the song for you?

>> No.47916975

>tfw Blofeld still isn't here

>> No.47917093
File: 79 KB, 345x343, 1369099492532.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47917093

>>47916975
>buying a meme synth

>> No.47917129

>>47917093
I bought it before we decided it was the meme synth. And I was one of the people who decided it was the meme synth anyways.

>> No.47917976
File: 1.94 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47917976

Took out my favorite mixer today. I love everything about it but it's gigantic size.

I can't even pick a favorite part because so much if it is nice.

>> No.47917982

>>47917093
>meme
pls stop

>> No.47918075

>>47917982
It's the reaction image kid, he's never going to stop shitting up these threads.

>> No.47918596

For those of you who do any mixing and dont torrent their plugins, Waves is having a massive sale which is pretty rad. If you buy some of the fuckhuge plug-in bundles its still expensive as fuck but some of the smaller ones seem useful and aren't too bad.
I just bought the Gold bundle to get my home studio stuff kick started for 300 bucks (they email out coupons if you have an account so i got another 50 bucks off) instead of the original 800.

>> No.47918610

>>47911002

I could offer Jordan Rudess a turkey sandwhich to promote LMMS or whatever shit. Dude is the biggest whore in the world.

>> No.47918649

Working a song sounding like a cross between Underground Resistance (REPRESENT) and Gesaffelstein, gonna add some Eric B. and Rakim flair. Fuck are you up to

>> No.47918701

>>47918649
>Fuck are you up to
not being 100% derivative

>> No.47918703
File: 19 KB, 367x332, 1399727796756.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47918703

>>47918596
>mfw people pay any amount of monies for plugins

>> No.47918744
File: 386 KB, 960x706, 1403147217255.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47918744

I was drunk as fuck last night and made this.
I don't know if anyone will enjoy it, but I'll share it.

http://www52.zippyshare.com/v/12993603/file.html

>> No.47918759

>>47918703
soz bro, couldnt find a torrent but i'm not exactly strapped for cash so it wasnt a big deal.

>> No.47918772

>>47918703
Did you ever post as the Froosh?

>> No.47918918
File: 9 KB, 296x333, 1404069884797.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47918918

>>47915198
>acoustic treatment

>> No.47918956

>>47918759
if i had plenty of money i would flush it down the toilet, too.

>> No.47918968
File: 11 KB, 252x221, 1404077150954.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47918968

>>47916094

>monitors turned up to 11
>hear this

>> No.47918996

>>47918956
sure. if you happen to have a torrent copy of that Diamond or Platinum bundle, hit me up.

>> No.47919062
File: 353 KB, 1306x736, 2013-10-19_22-25-42_7.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47919062

Currently moving stuff around so I can more easily use everything.

I really wish I had some big ass shelves or something.

>> No.47919079

>>47918772
are you looking for a long lost friend or something?

>> No.47919107

>>47918918
Yeah, you're the Froosh, aren't you? Why else would you be using the same shitty trolling tactics and reaction images.

>> No.47919181

>>47919079
I already found you ;^)

>> No.47919209
File: 3.18 MB, 3264x2448, poor.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47919209

>>47918956
how u feel about dis playboi

>> No.47919308

>>47919209
He doesn't give a shit about production. You're giving him exactly what he came to this thread for. Just do what guitar generals did and ignore him.

>> No.47919314

>>47919181
..? uhh m8 dont take this the wrong way and all but you sound like you might be just at least a lil bit confused.

>> No.47919371

what are some genuinely good orchestral VSTs?

>> No.47919386

>>47919314
;^)

>> No.47919404

>>47919371
You just asked for two completely different things.

>> No.47919436

>>47919404
simply epic

>> No.47919482

>>47919436
I wasn't ragging on plugins, but samples are just about the only way to go. Plugins dedicated to orchestral sounds are usually terribad.

>> No.47919502

>guy says he'll sell me blofeld for great deal
>can hardly believe how good the deal is
>talk for a bit
>ask him questions about why he's selling it for so cheap, try not to be an asshole, explain I don't have money, optimistic
>it's been an hour with no response

I'm starting to worry

>> No.47919514

>>47919502
How are you chatting with him? And what price?

>> No.47919553

>>47919482
>usually
there you go

there's one i know, but i can't find a torrent for the full thing.

>> No.47919559

>>47919514
email, he sent me a picture with the timestamp with my name and the date next to the blofeld. $400 dollars with the sampling licence. I just got a little nervous is all, asked him a few questions. I did say I felt bad riddling him with questions, and that I usually don't look a gift horse in the mouth, but also that I don't have much money and don't have the chance to buy stuff like this often

>> No.47919646

>>47919559
$400 is pretty normal, but how did you establish contact? Surely you weren't just firing off messages to random emails.

Also, ask him to show a shipping receipt, if he objects, just back off, you'll always be able to find a blofeld for $400

>> No.47919705

>>47919646
I thought that was a sweet deal, with the license, but I don't really know. I posted on r/synthesizers about the blofeld and he hit me up from there. He said when he ships it he'll send me the tracking number, is that good enough?

>> No.47919712
File: 29 KB, 475x321, yeezus-tour.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47919712

https://soundcloud.com/tatamitown
>witchouse
>hip hop
>lotsa samples and some synths

I started producing this summer still experimenting with styles I've got a direction I want to go but I need to cop midi controllers, monitors, sound card, and a mic before I can do the post RnB witchouse funk I'm tryna produce

>> No.47919736

>>47919705
Sounds legit enough. Where is he from and how does he want payment?

>> No.47919771

>>47919736
The US, he can ship in a day. He wants it via paypal. I guess I'm most nervous because I've never bought anything like this before

>> No.47919838

>>47919771
I've done a few paypal transactions this way. Oddly enough I have a blofeld in the mail the same way. It seems sketchy as fuck, but it never turned out bad before.

>> No.47919898

>>47919838
The guy sent me his account on three other sites he's sold stuff on (ebay, KVR, discogs), which all shared the name on his email and that he originally told me on reddit, and he had 100% customer satisfaction. I guess I shouldn't be worried.

>> No.47920430
File: 73 KB, 746x514, 1363920914821.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
47920430

https://soundcloud.com/ejames28/fade-out-1

>mellow instrumental hip-hop

one of my favorite songs i've made, ill try to give feedback as much as possible!

>> No.47920644

>>47920430
i'll be totally honest mate
it sounds alright but it also sounds kind of run of the mill, like nothing there to make it stand out from the plethora of other music out there that is similar

some instrumental hip hop can stand on its own but this track would sound better with vocals in my opinion

not trying to be mean or anything just trying to give effective feedback

>> No.47920688

Just bought a dedicated laptop for music production. Anything I should install other than Ableton, ASIO4ALL and drivers for my gear?

>> No.47920821

>>47920688
An OS

>> No.47920824

>>47919502
anon from this

guy contacted me back, and wants me to cover shipping, has bumped up the price to $420

<|B^)

>> No.47920858

>>47920821
It already had one on there. =]

>> No.47920957

>>47920824
At this point, the only advantage you have is the sample liscence. Buy at your own discretion.

>> No.47920984

>>47920957
I think I'm gonna go with it, he'll ship it to my door in a day and I get a nice synth that I would have payed a lot more for otherwise.

>> No.47921002

>>47920644

most of my music is a work in progress at this point until I rally it all up and put it in a mixtape. Verses will come eventually after ive mastered all of my tracks, i'm trying to get at least 7 or 8 songs first. once I get 7 or 8 i'm gonna finish all of them and put it on bandcamp

thanks for the feedback also!

>> No.47921042

>>47921002
You would do a rough mix before having all of the elements in place. It would still need a final mix. Mastering shouldn't even be on your radar.

>> No.47921090

>>47919712
any feedback gents?

>> No.47921213

>>47921042
This. Especially with vocals.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action