Which artist has the worst Stans?
Kanye WestDance Gavin Dance apparently, actually scene core bands in gnereal
>>47174299I used to have a good friends that loved DGD so much he went to warped just to grab Johnny Craig's ass, which he successfully did.I mean, I like their music and all, but damn. They're not that great.
Nirvana
>>47174263Blood on the dance floor
Eminem, Tech N9ne, Hopsin, Yelawolf and all those shitty white-friendly hip hop that 16 year old boys like. It's kinda sad because they're starting to like Kendrick now, too, but I never was too into him anyway
Slayer
Not a single artist but OFWGKTA
Bjork
The Beatles
>>47174299>>47174320I never thought that DGD had that bad of fans. I saw them live a few months back and everyone was pretty chill.
>>47174409The picture is from the movie Gummo...
>>47174334I hate that because most modern Nirvana "fans" aren't really fans. They only buy their shirts and shit to seem edgy and cool, but they just look like chodes
>>47174340Honestly, blood on the DanceFloor fans don't have to do anything to be the worst fans ever. Just liking their shitty techno garbage is pathetic. If you like blood on the dancefloor, you should Kurt Cobain yourself
Coldplay
>>47174263literally eminem
Surprised no one has said Odd Future yet. But yeah I can agree with most of these. Kanye stans don't seem too bad to me honestly but otherwise yeah these are all pretty accurate
Of mice & men. They're fucking singer beat a man unconscious with the help of a drum tech, but if you tell a fan that, they'll always say "oh, he was making fun of a fan who had cancer and died! He deserved to get beat up!" Which is total bull shit for 2 reasons. >the band themselves have never said anything about this cancer girl>and no one just goes up to someone and says "lol she died from cancer lol fag." Maybe on the internet, but not in real life.
Scenecore and Hot Topic-core. Someone wrote an incredibly angry and long post about it one time, I'll try to find it in the archive.
>>47176697>Surprised no one has said Odd Future yetthey did>>47174430
>>47176519Real Nirvana fans are even worse. They complain incessantly about people wearing t-shirts while pretending that grunge music was good
the final boss of terrible fanbases.Juggalos
>>47176714>>and no one just goes up to someone and says "lol she died from cancer lol fag." Maybe on the internet, but not in real life.You're very naive if you believe people can't be that cruel.
>>47176519how the fuck do you know?
>>47176944This.Insane Clown Posse fans are something else.
grimes
>>47174263None.
>>47178875>grimes>stansShe has the exact same stans as every other indie/pop qt
>>47176980>Welcome to /mu/
>>47176944this
>>47175522>>47175522>>47175522>>47175522
worst band/worst fans
Honestly......Led Zeppelin.I don't want to be the "everything that is old is dadrock" asshole, but Zep was good enough I guess.Their fans just act like no other music existed and if you bring up a good band from around that era like Blue Cheer or Sabbath, they can't even fake a conversation. >oh my god john bonham played a drum solo without drum sticks im so weird i listen to experimental music born in le wrong generation
definitely my bloody valentine
>>47180472God, that reminds me>16>junior in high school>stoner/addicted to opiates>doom metal, stoner metal, desert rock, psychedelia, and classic country western/folk was my shit>friends with somewhat similar music tastes>jamming with them on the beach one night>friend is on guitar, I'm on bongos, and other friend is using my acoustic bass>guitar friend gets a big fucking grin on his face>I DONT PRACTICE SANTARIA>awkwardly play along and hate everything>mfw
Drake
Dadrockers of any kind. But Beatles fans are objectively the worst. The majority of them have only ever listened to their greatest hits CD, or Abbey Road and mouth off about how great they are. They get so anally frustrated when you call them out for being a mediocre boy band who only produced 3-4 good albums and even those were a bit wonky at some points.They sucked at making albums.
>>47180559Go home, Pierro>tfw it's actually very true>tfw if the Beatles weren't so over rated they would be /mu/core and you know it
>>47180585I think While My Guitar Gently Weeps is one of my favourite songs along with Something, but they blew at making albums, they had no cohesion or over-arching theme to them. And no, they would not be /mu/core. Critics during the 60's never lauded the Beatles as the greatest rock band, or even acknowledged them to be anything more than what they were, a decent pop-band.The Beachboys, VU, and Beefheart all blow the beatles out of the water.
>>47180474>fan's face when you remind them that The Shadows did it more often, better and before>fan's face when hearing the Yardbirds and realizing that Page played the same way in his entire life>not to mention that he pretty much just played variations of six songs
>>47180474While i do love led zeppelin, i do hate that so many idolise only them from that period. IMO deep purple put out some much better albums in the same period and all anyone remembers them for is fucking smoke on the water. Also ritchie blackmore solos just shit all over jimmy pages. Its just that deep purple managed to all stay alive in the 80s and 90s long enough for people to forget about them
>>47180629that's bullshithow on earth are the beatles albums not cohesive on a sonic and textural level with the exception of white album (even then..)the beach boys /would/ blow them out of the water if all their stuff was on par with pet sounds or the smile sessions but they released far less good content than the beatles
>>47180816Lol, not even close. Pet Sounds is the best album of the 60's, and arguably of all time. The beatles never managed to put anything that's even a fraction as good as that, same goes with TVUN. The Beatles had their producer to thank for pretty much everything. George Martin is the reason they ever got as far as they did. The Beach Boys also have albums extending past Pet Sounds and Smile Sessions.
You people act as if dadrock or dadrock fans threaten your very existence.I don't understand why.
>>47180923They're the most vocal group of musical listeners. Literally no one else goes around blathering in real life about how shit eveyone's taste in music is except these people. >inb4 /mu/
>>47180968And blather threatens your very existence. Good to know.
>>47180997Where did I imply they threatened my existence fuck face?
I'm surprised no one has said Morrissey fans, those people can be fucking crazy in the worst way possible
>>47181008When you start cussing people out with minimal provocation.
>>47181103Reading out smiths lyrics out of context to a friend whos a huge fan and he tries to justify themIts hilarious, try it sometime
>>47181142hey theres nowt wrong with smiths lyrics just fucking morrissey
>>47176714so true and the fact that they're pure fucking shite fuck cunt bags
>>47181184Who writes the lyrics?
>>4718140480s morrissey. the lyrics dont equal the man
>>47180629>Critics during the 60's never lauded the Beatles as the greatest rock band, or even acknowledged them to be anything more than what they were, a decent pop-band.I want you to guess how wrong this is.
>>47181669>implying i'm not right.