/mu/ - Music (Temp full images)

>>46844519
Nice shitpost.

the beatles were actually kind ofcool, i wish i was around to see them, these justins and beibers r a joke

>>46844519
I agree op I was born in le right generation as well *tips fedora*

>>46844721
that's a good meme

>>46844519
yeah... thatll show the dumb dadrockers..... now back to my meme rap and indie, ACTUAL GOOD MUSIC!!!

>>46844519
I'm excited for the day Justin bieber becomes fedora-core

>>46844677
but they were the biebers of that time

>>46844772
gene complaining about /mu/drones again. typical.

>>46844819
>wrote their own music
>performed their own instruments
>impressive songwriting, whether or not you think they were innovative
but yeah, pretty much Bieber

Fuck me, /mu/ is so shit right now.

>>46844721
this guy doesn't like the Beatles, that's the opposite of your faggot meme.
I bet you were just scrolling through every thread jacking your little tiny erect dick any scanning for something dadrock related so you could post that and get all the bitches.

>>46844519

epic post brah

le right generation for teh win :)

>>46844519
It's alright to think that way, but you have to understand that they evolved as a band and started producing more meaningful content than just the uninspired pop I am presuming that you hate. That's why they're significant in terms of contemporary music, not because of "Please please me" or fucking "Love me do".

http://web.archive.org/web/20090902021356/http://www.mojo4music.com/blog/beatles-top-20_19.shtml
http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/article.php?id=34064#.UhEaQT_uC5x
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles%27_recording_technology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles%27_influence_on_popular_culturehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cover_versions_of_the_Beatles_songs
http://www.allmusic.com/artist/the-beatles-mn0000754032/related
http://suite101.com/article/the-impact-of-the-beatles-on-pop-rock-hip-hop-and-rb-music-a283101
http://www.listology.com/flfrleta/story/piero-scaruffi-beatles-and-elvis-presley
http://www.krautrock.com/articles/int_czukay.html
http://www.npr.org/2009/09/09/112656949/all-their-loving-jazz-covers-the-beatles
http://music.cbc.ca/#/blogs/2013/9/From-Ella-Fitzgerald-to-Frank-Sinatra-jazz-does-the-Beatles
http://2akordi.net/znanje/teorija/beatles.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-mW9CjCHfc
http://books.google.com/books?id=FGJQSSoSIhMC&pg=PA75&dq=Marilyn,+I%27m+gonna+make+the+greatest+album!+The+greatest+rock+album+ever+made&hl=en&sa=X&ei=xxrEUszpMOeTyQGko4DgCw&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Marilyn%2C%20I%27m%20gonna%20make%20the%20greatest%20album!%20The%20greatest%20rock%20album%20ever%20made&f=false

>>46844721
Consider this.
There are those who like top 40 artists exclusively, those who are big fans of one direction and justin bieber and whatever.
Then, there are those who take the piss out of them, who much prefer older music like the beatles and led zeppelin and queen and what have you.
Then, there are most people here who hate these 'le wrong generation' lot and take the piss out of them because they think there's no good music anymore.
And now, we've come all the way back around and you're taking the piss out of those who think that we are living in an age of good music and most old music sucks.

It's like a circle of shitposting.

>>46845094
yeah, but someone has to be right. and led zep and the beatles are awful. queen is indescribably terrible.

>>46845094
Consider this:
In the le wrong vs. le right generation war, one camp has the filter of time on their side while the other does not.

Which do you think is going to listen to better music?

>>46844854
Summer.

>>46845230
>the Beatles are awful
(not true, by the way)

>>46845243
Yeah, but one has rose-tinted glasses and the other doesn't.

>>46845309
>Which do you think is going to listen to better music?

>>46844519
they were influential on kevin parker and the tame impalae

>>46844772
classic gene! show them /mu/drones what's up!

>>46845037
Influential doesn't necessarily means they were good in any means, fuck off

>>46845349
http://2akordi.net/znanje/teorija/beatles.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-mW9CjCHfc
Great songwriters, Lennon and McCartney.

>>46845321
>filter of time
>filter of time

I have the filter of my exceptional taste on my side unlike ur mum's vagina.

The Beatles are one of the most underrated bands of all time.

>>46845388

>>46845396
You sure they weren't just viral marketed ;)

The fact that so many books still name the Beatles "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success: the Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worth of being saved.

>>46845396
On /mu/? Definitely.

>>46845408
lmao didn't think you'd take it that hard bitch boy

>>46845422
Fuck off newfag.

Spamming that shit isn't funny.

>>46845435
>>46845422

>>46845435
educate yourself

>>46845445
lol someone's mad

>>46845470
[citation needed]

>>46844519

We are sceptical about popular artists now and with good reason but at the dawn of modern pop, the beatles really were talented and influential.

Even if it isn't directly from their music it was their ability to re-invent themselves with every album or their personalities and the controversy often surrounding them that has inspired generations of artists.

Watch the BBC Top of the Pops special compilation of all the artists that covered their hits and it's that may for just one TV show, let alone how many that have actually covered them or just cited them as inspiration.

I'm not even a big beatles fan but to see they were bad, overrated or not influential is just plain wrong.

>>46844519
Hi Scaruffi

the beatles were very good at taking experimental ideas at the time and working them into something very listenable, publicly digestible, and timeless.

the beatles are the carl sagan of musical experimentation.

>>46845230

Soooooo true brother.

We, as the right generation, should continue to proudly proclaim ourselves as the greatest music creators in history. I'm so proud......I actually find myself crying when I think about it all. Keep them faith fellow brethren.

>>46845230
Did you know you can like old and new music both?