[ cgl / con / g / mu / qa / w ] [ index / top / reports / FAQ / DAAS / IG / status / transparency / fuuka ] [ img-search ]
As Dark As My Soul Default Fuuka

/mu/ - Music (Temp full images)


View post   

File: 3 KB, 208x58, step it up.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39863381 No.39863381 [Reply] [Original]

http://anthony.liekens.net/pub/scripts/last.fm/supereclectic.php

How eclectic is /mu/'s taste? Let's see.

>> No.39863391

>>39863381
>898
what, I score 610 and am pretty sure my taste is eclectic as fuck

>> No.39863402

>637/1000
Fair enough.

>> No.39863407

713

>> No.39863452

>787

Okay

>> No.39863456

>1000/1000

step it up plebs

>> No.39863471

>>39863381
>739/1000
wow i seriously doubt that

>> No.39863488

no idea how this shit is calculated, but all i remember is that it was really high 3 years ago when all i listened to was generic /mu/-core and it's been downhill since then

>> No.39863508

716

>> No.39863523
File: 25 KB, 632x473, well then.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39863523

>lying on the internet
Why would you do such a thing?

>> No.39863533

691
Should try to do better but whatever it's okay

>> No.39863542

>>39863523
my sides

>> No.39863550

>>39863523
lel

>> No.39863552
File: 16 KB, 225x245, youtoo.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39863552

749/1000

okay

>> No.39863563
File: 3 KB, 444x73, ec.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39863563

tough life being eclectic

>> No.39863566

728/1000

>> No.39863569

>>39863523
omg save the shit, fucking save this shit. Show this to /b/.

>> No.39863572

>>39863488
it uses your top 50 artists and compares the number of "similar artists" each of those artists shares

so if your top 50 is all mainstream shit (read: you haven't reset your play count or purposely omitted scrobbles in order to look more cultured), you're fucked

>> No.39863573
File: 4 KB, 336x67, not.even.indie.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39863573

couple years ago it was 873, now it's only 805/1000.

>> No.39864093

613/1000, I thought I'd do better than that.

>> No.39864360

>>39864093
haha faggot

>> No.39864397

>843/1000

i'm ok with this

>> No.39864442

>741/1000
last time I checked it was ~400

>> No.39864532

>>39863381
my highest eclectics are not even close to eclectic
Foals (6)
Earl Sweatshirt (5)
Interpol (5)
Captain Murphy (5)
Bombay Bicycle Club (5)
Tyler, the Creator (4)
The Strokes (4)
Bonobo (4)
Mount Kimbie (4)
Friendly Fires (4)
Madvillain (4)
Tame Impala (4)
Bloc Party (4)
Washed Out (4)
Editors (4)
Vampire Weekend (4)
Grimes (3)
Tokyo Police Club (3)
Zero 7 (3)
Two Door Cinema Club (3)

>> No.39864535
File: 1 KB, 218x46, eclectic.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39864535

>> No.39864541

>>39864532
no one cares about that shit post the score retard

>> No.39864550

>>39863523
this is funny but why assume he edited the value? Some people are just eclectic

>> No.39864555

>>39864550
hes upset that his is like 500 so he cant accept that anyone else has a higher score

>> No.39864574

>>39863381
>771
bretty gud :DD

>> No.39864575

>>39864555
this is probably the truth

also nice trips

>> No.39864591

851

>> No.39864753

>>39863381
this website creates sort of a paradox

the site check what you listen and check the artists last.fm its similar
if they share alot of similar artists, this means they are similar and you are less ecletic

the problem is: the core idea of last.fm is that you will problably like the recommended artists, the site will give.
yet this website goes against last.fm, sayying its a bad idea

>> No.39864779

>>39863523
the fix for that is easy.
someone ask the user name and the guy check to see if the score is real using the website

>> No.39864817

785
>tfw used to be 822
feels good. anthony liekens can suck my little donger.

>> No.39864941

815
i wish music was good

>> No.39865003
File: 366 KB, 640x480, vlcsnap-2013-04-08-01h02m23s253.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865003

4/1000

:~(

>> No.39865015

>>39865003
dang, you'd have to go out of your way to hit that number. do you only listen to like 3 bands or some shit?
what's your last.fm? im genuinely curious.

>> No.39865038
File: 346 KB, 480x368, vlcsnap-2013-05-10-01h33m06s252.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865038

>>39865015
last.fm/user/catsinspace

>> No.39865060

>>39865038
it says 762, stop lying.

>> No.39865077

0/1000

t-t-that's good isn't it?

>> No.39865089
File: 251 KB, 640x480, vlcsnap-2013-06-30-02h23m58s44.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865089

>>39865060
you mean you thought i am serious ?

>> No.39865093

>>39865089
no :DDD

>> No.39865095

828/1000
This computer algorithm's assessment of my listening habits pleases me.

>> No.39865104
File: 1.11 MB, 250x187, 1369627276326.gif [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865104

>>39865089
what a fibber.

>> No.39865107
File: 118 KB, 500x409, 1378223923213.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865107

896/1000

>> No.39865116
File: 365 KB, 480x368, vlcsnap-2013-05-10-00h34m37s232.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865116

>>39865093
>>39865104
ehehehheehehhehehehehe

>> No.39865128

720/1000. It used to be higher when I only listened to p4k-core :(

>> No.39865133

>771/1000

>> No.39865136

703, not bad.

>> No.39865163

>>39863381
>767/1000
Feels god, man.

>> No.39865173

837/1000
P cool.

>> No.39865191
File: 2.87 MB, 252x196, Someone is probably jacking off to this right now.gif [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865191

730
Could be worse

>> No.39865215

>>39865191
Why would somebody make that gif.

>> No.39865233

>>39865215
I honestly don't know.

>> No.39865237

>502/1000

>> No.39865239

>>39865233
:/

>> No.39865251

>>39865239
sry

>> No.39865263

>>39865251
It's ok.

>> No.39865268

>>39865263
ty

>> No.39865280

>>39865268
Strand of Oaks koncert i aften. Det bliver godt.

>> No.39865286

>>39865191
>that gif
And here I was having a good day.

>> No.39865295
File: 14 KB, 630x480, 1373724903520.gif [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865295

>>39865191

>> No.39865296

>>39865280
Desværre kan jeg ikke komme, starter året med en dejlig stor aflevering som jeg kom for sent i gang med. Hyg dig.

>>39865286
Sorry

>> No.39865297
File: 5 KB, 274x53, lelele.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865297

> tfw pleb

>> No.39865307

>>39865296
Fuck det, jeg har tre afleveringer til denne uge som jeg ikke er begyndt med. Er da ligeglad. Will do.

>> No.39865325

>670/1000
I don't even care

>> No.39865338

>728
Does that mean I am special?

Also
>anthoney.liekens
I thought it shows how much Fantano approves of your last.fm

>> No.39865357

>>39865307
Jeg har stadig ingen billet, og får at være ærlig er jeg ikke kæmpe Strand of Oaks fan. Jeg har kun hort Pope Killdragon

>> No.39865363
File: 1.27 MB, 181x224, 1350971656241.gif [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865363

>>39865338
>I thought it shows how much Fantano approves of your last.fm
lel

>> No.39865371

>>39865338
>I thought it shows how much Fantano approves of your last.fm
my sides

>> No.39865377

821
I was expecting something like 600.
Well.

>> No.39865420

>781

Huh, was expecting lower. I feel like, recently, all I listen to is hazy psychedelic rock and shoegaze.

>> No.39865477
File: 556 KB, 1496x1432, v goes to prom.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865477

>937

>> No.39865574

777/1000

And it's all downtempo/triphop stuff. The only difference between the music is that song artists are a bit more soft and other more electro.
I thought I was casual, and everything has changed now.

>> No.39865588

812/1000

>> No.39865608

742

Now I can die happy with this new found knowledge.

>> No.39865626
File: 5 KB, 697x99, am i eclectic yet.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865626

>> No.39865633

>>39865477
jesus christ

>> No.39865647

This isn't really very accurate if it relies on Last.fm's "similar artist" thing. Most artists who show up on those pages are there because they have some relation to the artist, not because they sounds alike.

>> No.39865656

>>39865477
im sure that guy is really nice.

>> No.39865664

>>39865647
last.fms suggestions have been really underwhelming for me so far.
i think the spotify and MOG and allmusic algorithms are my favourites.

>> No.39865704

>>39865626
what?

>> No.39865786

>>39865647
Yep. It would recommend you Jesu if you have listened to Godflesh before, but the two aren't similiar at all.

>> No.39865842

>>39865647
last.fm is not really accurate because os some reasons
a guy that just listen to one track from artist, but listen to it alot, means the same that a guys that listen to various tracks form the artist but with a little less listens.
you can't "hate stuff": the guys that love lady gaga but hate briney spears means nothing to lady gaga recommendation.


its biased toward what people know.
lets say iron maiden is 1% similar to nirnava, that means that 1% of the guys that like iron maiden and also know that nirvana exist, will like nirvana too. Now imagine a nother metal band that is 80% similar to iron maiden.
now imagine that 100000 that like iron maiden know nirvana, this means 1000 iron maiden listeners liking nirvana. Now, imagine that 100 guys that like iron maiden know the other metal band, 80 guys that like iron maiden will like the other band.
This kind of popularity thing mess with the recommendations, on profiles of mainstream post-grunge artists from brazil, you have country like artists from brazil as recommendation.
Something that would help to fix this problem would be including some sort of hate system (dont know how this would be possible with last.fm). Another thing that would help to fix that, would be to make the amount of bands a user know influence the recommendation system

>> No.39865891

>>39865842
>Another thing that would help to fix that, would be to make the amount of bands a user know influence the recommendation system
HOLY FUCK I WOULD LOVE TO FUCKING SEE THAT

I actually give this idea to some guy that has a last.fm app, but he said he (and not last.fm) cant do it because of bandswrcith

>> No.39865905

>>39865842
holy smokes that was in depth and confusing.

>> No.39865925
File: 95 KB, 694x534, midgetto52.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865925

>>39863523
Fuck. Laughed right out loud. Hilarious.

But, I mean, you can check the username if you don't believe the value...

>> No.39865941

>>39865905
yes, and there is another problem I forgot, the fact that the recommendation system problably use the overall chart instead of last.fm 3 months one to get recommendations.

I also didnt posted the idea about how the first problem can be fixed

>> No.39865958

>>39865191
>that gif
What the fuck am I watching.

>> No.39865971

>>39865338
>I thought it shows how much Fantano approves of your last.fm
That's this website:
http://www.last.fm/user/theneedledrop

>> No.39865981

Funny thing is that i haven't listened to most those artists for a long time now.

>> No.39865986
File: 8 KB, 638x70, Untitled.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39865986

radicool

how is this shit even calculated

also it says i listen to mudhoney, which i dont

>> No.39865989

>>39865971
i plugged fantano's account into the thing and he's got 738.

>> No.39865994

>>39865971
Your musical compatibility with theneedledrop is Super

Music you have in common includes Death Grips, Primal Scream, Altar of Plagues, Tyler, the Creator and Queens of the Stone Age.


Yes!

>> No.39866018
File: 19 KB, 657x497, asdfq43tsdg.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39866018

>>39865981
lel forgot picture

>> No.39866762

hey guys im here. i will now carefully acknowledge all your scores.

>> No.39866923

795/1000
this has to be a lie because all i listen to is kawaii techno and idol metal
also it says i listen to サニーデイ・サービス, The Olivia Tremor Control and The Flaming Lips despite the fact i don't care about any of those units at all
this is some bullshit & if you believe it ur a NERD

>> No.39866962

>>39866923
It doesn't say that you listen to those bands.

>> No.39866981

>>39866962
then why are they there?? this is mad confusing

>> No.39867008

dvcky's super-eclectic score is

808/1000

its a sign i need even more trap rap in my life

>> No.39867017

>>39866981
>The following script takes the 50 top artists in your musical profile from Last.fm, and finds the collection of top 20 similar artists (where the artist itself is the #1 most similar artist) for this top 50. The resulting is a list of artists similar to your preferred artists. As the list is larger (maximum = 1000), your musical preference is more diverse.
It lists the bands that showed up in your top 50 similiar artists the most.

>> No.39867042

>>39867017
ew gross
i don't want to live in a world where that skank Mizca is considered similar to anything i've graced with my ears

>> No.39867049
File: 238 KB, 1920x1080, kfdls;fkds;.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39867049

eh, pretty good

>> No.39867071

>>39867049
who is your pastels bias

>> No.39867076
File: 11 KB, 653x488, 5465039.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39867076

Pretty good i think.

>> No.39867097

w_lves's super-eclectic score is

655/1000

As this number is larger, you have a more eclectic musical preference. People with scores over 700 have bragging rights. People whose score is below 400 should consider more musical styles!

The following are the artists with the most occurences in your list
James Ferraro (13)
Eric Copeland (9)
Pukers (8)
Laurel Halo (7)
yves/son/ace (7)
Maria Minerva (7)
Dean Blunt and Inga Copeland (6)
Hype Williams (6)
Sean McCann (6)
Wet Hair (6)
Lee Noble (6)
Pete Swanson (6)
The Savage Young Taterbug (5)
Ex-Cocaine (5)
The Microphones (5)
Lee Gamble (5)
Blues Control (5)
Dean Blunt (5)
Inga Copeland (5)
Animal Collective (5)

>> No.39867099

>783
well sweet

>> No.39867127
File: 20 KB, 350x350, 1369537114603.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39867127

>>39867076
>mfw checking the rest of the thread after posting
>my 841 is higher than most people that have posted
What the fuck, /mu/. You're supposed to be better than me

>> No.39867147

>>39867071
wat

>> No.39867173

>>39867147
who's your fave
(if the answer isn't Aggi you're wrong)

>> No.39867175
File: 220 KB, 2000x1422, 1376164964465.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39867175

>having anything under 800

>> No.39867178

>>39864753
for some reason a lot of people just use last.fm to track what music they listen, without necessarily even looking at the recommendations. i guess this rating system is for people like that

>> No.39867199

>>39867173
I don't know Aggi but I think she should be thrown off the bridge

>> No.39867265

>>39867173
>>39867173
Uh aggi's pretty good but I guess I'd have to say Stephen is my favourite, seeing how he's the pastels and everything

>> No.39867317
File: 22 KB, 663x502, iiiiiiiii'm a winner.png [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39867317

>implying I even really enjoy the artists on this list

>> No.39867371

>>39867317
>not really enjoying The Jesus Lizard
pleb

>> No.39867493

>>39867371
I'm sorry, would you like to compare scores and then assert my plebdom upon me? :>)

>> No.39867514

>>39867493
No :DDDD

>> No.39867741

>>39867493
>>39867514
you guys are the best :DD

>> No.39868253

>>39865971
there is the rym one and its a better one

>> No.39868396

who the fuck uses last fm

>> No.39869500
File: 31 KB, 641x495, b-but muh last.fm recommendations.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
39869500

>no

>> No.39869884

703

>> No.39870899

669/1000
Well shit, 666 would have been funny.

>> No.39871055

>>39868396
Loads of people on /mu/

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action