>Dubstep>MusicI think it's high time that we all sat down and had a long talk about what constitutes "music".
Sounds
Music is subjective, not objective. If you can melodically burp and shit your pants there will be people who enjoy it and deem it music. I fucking hate dupstep but there's no sense in arguing about it.
>>36960186>Music is subjective, not objective.>>>/out/
ITT: Autism
I'd say music = arranged sounds
Shitposting general
it's fun when people say something they don't like 'isn't even music'
>>36960145Go back to your thread>>36959102
>>36960219What about improvised music?
>>36960219Actually music = soundCategorizing it this way makes everything much easier.
>>36960145Music can be ANY sound that is pleasurable to listen to. A recording of a dog barking could be considered music.I don't really like dubstep, but of course it's music. Any sound can be music.
Start here, then discuss based on what the accepted definition of music is. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/music
Dubstep died like two years ago. Why are people complaining about it now?
>>36960240Its even better when they try to actually argue its not music.
>>36960419Skream, Benga, Coki, Rusko, Mount Kimbie, Horsepower Productions, etc. are all still alive.
>>36960419People have been complaining about it since Skrillex happened
>>36960550>People have been complaining about it since brostep happenedFixed that for you.
>>36960570Nobody was complaining when Rusko and Caspa dropped fabriclive.37, only when Skrillex popularised it did people start complaining.
>>36960611That's because no one knew what the fuck dubstep was until Skrillex came around.
>>36960623Nice projection m80People in the know about dubstep actually really enjoyed fabriclive.37
>>36960656Yep.Then Skrillex came, put dubstep in the main stream, then artists started copying his style. Luckily that phase is more or less over now
testing trips
No.36960145