[ cgl / con / g / mu / qa / w ] [ index / top / reports / FAQ / DAAS / IG / status / transparency / fuuka ] [ img-search ]
As Dark As My Soul Default Fuuka

/mu/ - Music (Temp full images)


View post   

File: 101 KB, 500x500, radiohead-pablo-honey.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
35859023 No.35859023 [Reply] [Original]

Why, /mu/? Why does this have to exist!?

>> No.35859040

That album has two good songs on it

>> No.35859043

because radiohead recorded & released ir

>> No.35859089

>>35859043
Yeah, that's the reason I hate it, because I love having the entire discography of artists I like, but this motherfucker here messes me up.

>> No.35859139

it's the baby

he made the entire album

>> No.35859154

Because of bands like Blur

>> No.35859177

>>35859023
'cause I'M A CREEP

>> No.35859211
File: 29 KB, 300x300, clearly the inferior album.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
35859211

pablo honies general?

>> No.35859266

Because everyone has to start somewhere. Radiohead just so happened to start off trying really hard to be U2, Creep is still gr88888

>> No.35859315

Because you were born after it was released.

If you had listened to it in 1994, it was pretty good.

>> No.35859384

You have to put it into the context of the year it was released. In 1994, it was better than a lot of stuff released. Do you know what the top Alternative Rock album in 1994 was? Blur's Parklife. PH sounds a bit better, doesn't it?

>> No.35859413

ANYONE CAN PLAYYYY GUITARRRRRRRRR

>> No.35859430

>>35859266
> Radiohead just so happened to start off trying really hard to be U2

What? PH sounds nothing like U2. You're thinking of The Bends.

>> No.35859519

You know what, you kids are getting a little exhausting pretending that Pablo Honey is the only bad album in Radiohead's discography. Why does it bother you so much? Their career had other pitfalls, what makes this one so special?

>> No.35859523

>>35859315
>>35859384
The Nirvana argument is not ever a valid argument to try and claim how good or bad an ablum is. Nobody cares how good something sounded to you then, the great thing about the internet is that we can look at everything in retrospect to all of the other albums of its time with ease, so we don't have to rely on only liking what was big on the radio then.

>> No.35859566

>>35859523
Who mentioned Nirvana?

>> No.35859603

>>35859566
The Nirvana argument is they were great in the context of what was around at the time and that's why they are considered the greatest artist of the modern era.

>> No.35859610

Creep though....
creep is a top 10 radiohead song

>> No.35859683

I'M NOT A VEGETABLE!!!
I WILL NOT CONTROL MUHSELF!!1
XDDD

>> No.35859791

>>35859603
>>35859523
Oh, so you've listened to other rock albums in 1993 then? List ten of them that were better than Pablo Honey.

>> No.35860026

>>35859211
>not volta

>> No.35860066

>>35859791
The point is it's still shit in the context of overall music before it. It's true the 90's were an objectively terrible decade for music but being the best of the worst is not an achievement.

I could easily come up with ten better albums but you are going to say they're not rock (which is fair) but meaningless.

>> No.35860082

>>35859040
What is the 2nd?

>> No.35860105

>>35859023
So that Creep could be released

>> No.35860166

>>35859519
I disagree. Maaaaybe the Bends too

>> No.35860203

>>35859023
I actually find this kinda good

>> No.35860247

>>35859610
At least top 5

>> No.35860260
File: 34 KB, 368x368, 1360550582095.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
35860260

>>35860203

>> No.35860327

>>35860066
>The point is it's still shit in the context of overall music before it
le wrong generation? XD
>I could easily come up with ten better albums but you are going to say they're not rock (which is fair) but meaningless.
Well don't post them if they're not rock albums. If you don't seem to understand context then maybe you shouldn't be critically listening to music.

>> No.35860329

>>35860066
>What's hip-hop?

>> No.35860460

>>35860327
Jesus Christ, you fucking child. First of all, the 90's were nobody's generation who's posting on here (if you're in your 30's and posting on here I suggest suicide). And second of all, every year has great music, not every year has great music in [insert genre here]. You don't understand the context of rating music clearly if you think bad music should be praised simply because it was a bad year for that kind of music. Good music is timeless. Pablo Honey is not. Fuck off and wipe that snot off your face.

>> No.35860481

>>35860329
I don't know, you mean the genre that peaked in the 80's?

>> No.35860531

>>35860460
OK so name me 10 better rock albums from 1994.

>> No.35860643

>>35860460
>(if you're in your 30's and posting on here I suggest suicide)
Why?

>> No.35860858

>>35860531
You are completely missing the point. Rock wasn't the dominating genre in those years (there were a few gems, certainly not Radiohead though but things like hip-hop and electronic/dance music were coming into the forefront). However, if you look at music as a much larger picture, it had been doing great up until then so there's no reason to pardon Radiohead just because they were the steamiest pile.

>> No.35860878

>>35860531
1. Sonic Youth - Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star
2. R.E.M. - Monster
3. Beck - Mellow Gold
4. Dinosaur Jr. - Without a Sound
5. Nine Inch Nails - Downward Spiral
6. U2 - Zooropa
7. Sunny Day Real Estate - Diary
8. Blur - Parklife
9. Pavement - Crooked Rain, Crooked Rain
10. Oasis - Definitely Maybe

>> No.35860881

>>35860643
The average poster on this board is 14 and completely retarded, if your life is so bad you have no problem dealing with that every day for "fun", you have serious problems.

>> No.35860910

>>35860878
Isn't Zooropa '93? (Could be wrong)

>> No.35860929

>>35860878
>1. Sonic Youth - Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star
Nope
>2. R.E.M. - Monster
Nope
>3. Beck - Mellow Gold
Nope
>4. Dinosaur Jr. - Without a Sound
Nope
>5. Nine Inch Nails - Downward SpiralNope
>6. U2 - Zooropa
lel
>7. Sunny Day Real Estate - Diary
Eh
>8. Blur - Parklife
lel
>9. Pavement - Crooked Rain, Crooked Rain
Eh
>10. Oasis - Definitely Maybe
Nah

>> No.35860942

>>35860881
more like 17-18 id guess

>> No.35861041

>>35860942
see
>>35860929
I hope for the sake of the human race that's not true...I'm only 20 and I fucking feel like less of a person every time I come back here, it just gets worse and worse...I'm going to kill myself long before I'm in my 30's and browsing 4chan

>> No.35861042

>>35860878
Nigga knows what's up

>> No.35861071

>>35860531
Weezer- the Blue Album

>> No.35861090

It's really not that bad. The first half is solid and on par with The Bends, just a little cheesier. The second half is pretty shit but then that closer is amazing. Considering what was topping rock charts that year, it's not that bad.

>> No.35861105

>>35860881
Is it? I don't know, I don't pay attention to that. I'm just looking for new music. :) Why are you here?

>> No.35861129

>>35859023
Why is it bad

>> No.35861142

>>35860929
>U2
>lel
>Blur
>lel

How old are you?

>> No.35861143

>>35860858
>You are completely missing the point. Rock wasn't the dominating genre in those years (there were a few gems, certainly not
Oh so you want to compare apples and oranges? That's not really how it works.
>no reason to pardon Radiohead just because they were the steamiest pile.
How was it a steaming pile of shit anyways?

>> No.35861168

>>35861142
Those are very poor Blur and U2 albums. Try again.

>> No.35861191

>>35861071
How is that better than Pablo Honey? Quality-wise they are about as equal.

>> No.35861192

>>35861105
You must not have been here long, you'll never find new music. They just talk about the exact same stuff every day (this thread being a perfect example of it). I'm here to kill time until I have to go back to work since music is the only hobby I have worth talking about (I used to hang out on comic forums but, ironically, got exhausted of it because of all the negative children). I think the Internet just isn't for me anymore, ah to be a teenager again.

>> No.35861196
File: 156 KB, 500x547, only_dreams_now.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
35861196

>>35861041

>> No.35861224

>>35861041
I like to come here and make fun of people like you.

>> No.35861246

>>35861224
>implying that's any better
Jesus Christ, look at yourself.

>> No.35861271

>>35859430
The Bends sounded nothing like U2.

>> No.35861288

>>35859023
fuck it. I actually like this album. I admit >50% of it is complete garbage but songs like anyone can play guitar, you, blow out, and creep are quite good. I know nobody else will agree though :(

>> No.35861300

>>35861192
>comic forums
Oh, I also come here to make fun of people like you. :)

>> No.35861301

>>35861143
Just stop.

>> No.35861308

>>35860531
Souvlaki, Siamese Dream, In Utero, So Tonight That I Might See, A Storm in Heaven, Transmissions From The Satellite Heart, The Blue Album, Debut, Painful, Zooropa

>> No.35861341

>>35861196
Thank you Jimmy, I'm going to go listen to some depressing music now and cry myself to sleep.

>> No.35861349

The Social Network version of Creep is great, it's what got me into the band after only hearing Karma Police a few years prior to that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FnijiMZDaM

It's a brilliant movie too

>> No.35861357

>>35861246
OK.

Well I gotta get going, we're playing a gig in an hour, I was just killing time.

>> No.35861374

>>35861271
Just wondering, how much of U2's discography have you heard?

>> No.35861388

But Pablo Honey is a perfectly decent album. Objectively the band's worst, but it's hardly terrible.

>> No.35861443

>>35861308
>Souvlaki
Boring
>Siamese Dream
Sell out music
>In Utero
eh
>So Tonight That I Might See
Nope.
>A Storm in Heaven
Nope
>Transmissions From The Satellite Heart
Wannabes
>The Blue Album
See >>35861191
>Debut
Nope.
>Painful
Terrible
>Zooropa
See >>35861168

>> No.35861504

>>35861443
Why does everyone hate Zooropa? Sure it pales in comparison to Achtung Baby, but it's arguably U2's most interesting and experimental album.

>> No.35861529

>>35861504
Because the best song on it is performed by Johnny Cash.

>> No.35861535

>>35861504
Just because it's experimental doesn't mean it's good.

>> No.35861543

>>35859384

>first half of the 90s
>not one of the the best eras for music

I bet you don't like guitars

>> No.35861547

>>35861443
I don't exactly disagree with any of this, but these are all better than Pablo Honey.

>> No.35861576

>>35861443

>your opinion
>relevant

men, that was easy

>> No.35861602

>>35861547
Some sure. Others no. The rest are equal.

But what makes Pablo Honey a steaming pile of shit though?

Nothing.

>> No.35861624

>>35861543
Of course not, he kept wanting to list electronic and dance albums.

>> No.35861666

>>35861602
I never said it was. The first half is decent and the closing track is great. But it's still a whole lot worse than any other Radiohead album.

>> No.35861668

>>35860531
93 you mean

>What is Boces
>what is Slovaki
>What is Icky Mettle

>> No.35861679

>>35861529
Cash doesn't sing on Lemon.
>>35861535
Yes that's true. However, this album is much more interesting to me than anything than anything they've and the tracks are are all conceptually linked, rather than simply being a bunch of songs thrown together like some of their other albums.

>> No.35861687
File: 13 KB, 633x758, tfw.gif [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
35861687

>tfw no one else likes vegetable

>> No.35861688

>>35861374
The necessities.

>> No.35861707

>>35861668
>Slovaki
>you mean Souvlaki

>> No.35861711

>>35861668
No I meant 1994.

>What is Boces
Derivative
>what is Slovaki
Boring
>What is Icky Mettle
Zzzzzz

>> No.35861730

>>35861711
Does anyone really think Souvlaki is boring? It's a great album.

>> No.35861732

>>35861688
So Boy through Zooropa?

>> No.35861777

>>35861288
Congrats I agree with you those are the four songs I like on the album

>> No.35861791

>>35861732
If by that, you mean excluding half of October and Rattle and Hum and including half of Pop and a handful of post-2000 tracks, then yes.

>> No.35861819

>>35860481
Holy shit shut your fucking mouth.

>> No.35861844

>>35861819
>2013
>hating the classics

>> No.35861854

>>35861791
You can't answer for me. You can't silence me. This is not a dictatorship.

>>35861732
No I never listened to boy and I stopped after Achtung Baby, I think.

>> No.35861858

>>35861679
>Yes that's true. However, this album is much more interesting to me than anything than anything they've and the tracks are are all conceptually linked, rather than simply being a bunch of songs thrown together like some of their other albums.
OK but I thought the songwriting was extremely sub-par. That's fine if you want to conceptually link the songs and be more experimental, but the songs need to have a well-written ground.

>> No.35861873

>>35861730
No I didn't, it's alright.

>> No.35861886

>>35861844
>implying i hate the classics
>implying classics dictate the peak of a genre
>implying there aren't classics that came out after the 80's
pleb

>> No.35861890

>>35861791
October is complete crap, Rattle and Hum is great and they do have some good stuff past Zooropa but essentials are traditionally a period in a career. You don't just so skipping albums willy-nilly like some sort of fruit.

>> No.35861916

>>35861886
Are you seriously trying to tell me 90's hip-hop was better than 80's hip-hop? I'm not saying there hasn't been great hip-hop since the 80's, there's been some, but the 80's is the definitive peak of the genre.

>> No.35862011

>>35860481
You mean the late 00s

>> No.35862017

>>35861890
>October
>complete crap
Gloria, Tomorrow, October, and Fire say otherwise. The rest is pretty naff.
>Rattle and Hum
>great
>"This is a song Manson stole from the Beatles. We're stealing it back!"
>"Okay, Edge, play the blues!"
>"This song was written in a hotel room in New York City. This song is against South African APARTIIIIIEEETTT!!!!! (Apartheid)"
>"Am I bugging ya? I don't mean to bug ya!"

>> No.35862091

>>35862017
>implying that wasn't a better performance of Helter Skelter than The Beatles ever made

>> No.35862196

>>35862091
Considering that it wasn't that good of a song to begin with, it wouldn't be hard to outdo the Beatles.

>> No.35862203
File: 18 KB, 307x289, gloria.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
35862203

>>35862091
No stfu faggit

>> No.35862241

>>35861916
why di you think that? even the 80s artists like Scarface, NWA, Rakim, Kool G Rap, krs and whoever peaked in the 90s didnt they?

>> No.35862255

>>35862091
I ate you

>> No.35862273

I recently had a friend who was raving about Jack White's cover of "Love is Blindness" from the Great Gatsby soundtrack. I literally could not convince him that it was a U2 song and not a Jack White original. He kept saying stuff like "lol no way man. These lyrics are trademark Jack. There's no much emotion and heartbreak in them. U2 couldn't even come close to something like this."

>> No.35862296

>>35861711
but pablo honey came out in 93,

>> No.35862328

>>35862296
Yes I know.

>> No.35862419

>>35862203
>ulturiop
>not ulturbp

>> No.35862424

>>35859023
>You
>How Do You?
>Anyone Can Play Guitar
>Ripcord
>Vegetable
>Prove Yourself
>I Can't
>Killer Cars
Nice try.

>> No.35862462

>>35862419

>> No.35862470

>>35862424
>not Thinking About You

>> No.35862476

>>35859023
I really believe that if it wasn't for this album (Creep mostly) Radiohead would have been obsolete.

>> No.35862485

>>35861443
>>Siamese Dream
>Sell out music
Huehue
Nice try

>>In Utero
>eh
In Utero is GOAT

>> No.35862493

>>35862328
then why are comparing it to albums that came out in 94, that would just be unfair since that was another great year too.

Radiohead didn't bring A game till Ok Computer, I still love Pablo Honey but there were tons of better albums that came out Like Grace, Blue Album, Stereolabs Transiet-Sounds and Mars Audiac Quintet, Built to Spill etc.

>> No.35862515

>>35862470
Whoops, almost forgot that one, the US version is magical.

>> No.35862531

>>35862515
what are the different versions?

>> No.35862589

>>35862515
There's a US version, did Capitol pull a Meet the beatles, where the American version is better

>> No.35862612

>>35862485
That's not what Steve Albini says

>> No.35862666

>>35862589
No, not on that album. There was an alternate version of Thinking About You on some other release , but not Pablo Honey.

>> No.35862669

>>35862531
Oh, I have the deluxe version, so it comes with all sorts of different versions and demos.
I dun goofed, it was "Stop Whispering" which is also a great track.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMUuDer7lho

>> No.35862697

>>35862493
For the same reason that you compare 1992 albums to Nevermind.

>> No.35862713

>>35862612
>Steve Albini
>implying I care what he thinks

>>35862589
>>35862666
I dun goofed, it was Stop Whispering which had a different version.

>> No.35863031

>>35862713
>>implying I care what he thinks
Oh also Corgan said it was his sell out album
>I dun goofed, it was Stop Whispering which had a different version.
I figured that out as I was typing it, but that wasn't on Pablo Honey either. I have a Japanese issue of Pablo Honey with that and a bunch of other bonus tracks on it though. I liked the regular version of Stop Whispering anyways.

>> No.35863413

>>35859523
>>35859603
>>35860066

So what you're saying is that history has no meaning.

>> No.35863483
File: 70 KB, 900x1200, gonna do it, im srs!.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
35863483

Pablo Honey is the only halfway decent thing Radiohead ever did.
>yfw you finally realize your precious little band is actually shit

>> No.35863616

>>35863483
0/10
There literally isn't anyway anybody could think that and still take themselves seriously

>> No.35863716
File: 158 KB, 900x615, dorkophobic assholes.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
35863716

>>35863616
There literally isn't any way for someone to actually like Radiohead and have any respect for himself.

>> No.35863743

Because Blow Out

>> No.35863939

>>35863716
Why? They are a pretty good rock band.

>> No.35864643

>>35863031
I still fail to see how it was a sellout album.

>> No.35864773

>>35864643
Corgan, whose teen-friendly guitar rock seems a likely foundation for a Depeche Mode- or Cure-sized career, had the best of '93, finding the critical respect denied him in his hometown from the likes of the LA Times's Robert Hilburn and the New York Times's Jon Pareles (who named Siamese Dream their number-two and number-three albums of the year, respectively) and scoring an album headed for double-platinum status. Urge Overkill, a band made up of some very smart boys acting dumb, had a more ambivalent year, cursed, as they say, by the granting of all their wishes. The band had a good record company enthused about promoting a good record, and good wishes and support from all quarters: both alternative and mainstream radio, the press, MTV, Nirvana, you name it. Yet for some reason, while the group's very smart record sold respectably, it never really clicked with buyers. Nor did its even smarter videos turn on the MTV kids. On balance, the band was either too smart about being dumb or too dumb about being smart.

>> No.35864810

>>35864773
In your rush to pat these three pandering sluts on the heinie, you miss what has been obvious to the "bullshit" crowd all along: These are not "alternative" artists any more than their historical precursors. They are by, of and for the mainstream. Liz Phair is Rickie Lee Jones (more talked about than heard, a persona completely unrooted in substance, and a fucking chore to listen to), Smashing Pumpkins are REO Speedwagon (stylistically appropriate for the current college party scene, but ultimately insignificant) and Urge Overkill are Oingo Boingo (Weiners in suits playing frat party rock, trying to tap a goofy trend that doesn't even exist). You only think they are noteworthy now because some paid publicist has told you they are, and you, fulfilling your obligation as part of the publicity engine that drives the music industry, spurt about them on cue.

>> No.35865256

People actually like U2? People young enough to understand how to operate computers?

The more you learn.

>> No.35865497

>>35865256
You're joking right?

>> No.35865530

>>35865497
No, actually.

Next you're gonna tell me people like Bono.

>> No.35865730

>>35865530
Well they sell out arenas worldwide, so yes, there must be people in the world who like Bono.

>> No.35865878

>>35865730
That's like ... you know how there's people starving in Africa, and panty vending machines in Japan?

That's how I see people who like U2.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action