/mu/ - Music (Temp full images)

8.2

9.1

6.4

what the fuck is bnm?

I'm listening to it right now and all I can say is "yawn".

6.0 at best, and that's being waaaay too generous.

>>34849652
best new /mu/core

>>34849656
Far too deep for you, go back to your animal collection

next week is bnm all the way through

kurt vile - 8.5
james blake - 8.7
the knife - 8.8

9.2

>>34849714
>implying you won't say the same thing when they get a low score

If Pitchfork gives them a score higher than an 8.5 I will eat my hat. You can quote me on that.

>>34849730
Kurt Vile > The Knife > James Blake

>>34849737
Dunno who they is that you're referring to but I don't read reviews so I care very little.

>>34849800
>trying this hard
>"wah go listen to anco"

Secret P4k reader detected.

>>34849714
I don't like AnCo either. What now, moron?

Also,

>implying there's any depth to be found in this vapid wash of bleep-bloops

Don't try so hard, you'll hurt yourself.

>>34849811
I've never read it in my life, whatever though.
None of which changes that this album is too deep for you.

>>34849819
>being this pleb

>>34849759
Knife >>>>>> Vile >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blake

>>34849840
It's a piece of shit that is getting glorified because of its ambitious nature and it's length. It's exactly what happened with The Seer.

overgrown 9.0
shaking the habitual 7.6
if it's reviewed by lindsay zoladz, 9.3 bnm

>>34849856
I'm sorry to hear that you don't get it, maybe one day you will. Keep trying son.

can someone post a good copy please i feel i'm doing the knife a disservice by listening to their album on pitchfork advance only.

I think it'll be a 9 (and rightfully so).

>>34849892
>hurr durr don't get it 4deep9u XD
K thanks for proving that fans of this are retarded.

They're gonna pan Old Dreams

>>34849915
That's fine by me, you're the one that loses out. Have fun.

ITT; No actual musical discussion.

>>34849895
http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/8336637/The_Knife_-_Shaking_The_Habitual_2013_Electronic_320kbps_CBR_MP3

>>34849936
no one comes to /mu/ for musical discussion

>9.1 since that's what they gave to m b v and this album is better

>>34849950

That's a really sad thing to hear.

A bunch of people that share a beautiful, life-changing common interest that can't get along even the tiniest bit. Pathetic.

>>34849948
>tpb

>>34849965
>implying

>>34849972

>caring this much

>>34849972
>begging on /mu/ for a link

>itt

>>34850139
>using a funnie maymay from last year

>>34850139
Honestly though, I'd be surprised if it gets more than an 8.5. Pitchfork has been having a tendency of lowballing albums based on their current metacritic scores/other people's attitudes towards it; at least they've been doing that lately.

That's inconsistent with my review, and the rating I put on RYM.

3/10 -- poor attempt at impersonation.

>>34850223
What was your RYM rating Hamp?

Also, it's kind of sad that anime cat girls are how I can tell you from other people.

>>34850244
3.0/5, but I'm considering bumping it to 3.5/5

>implying it's not great that anime cat girls are how you can tell me from other people.

>>34850269
I don't mean it's sad in the sense that you're sad for using them, but a lot of people try impersonating you to the point where this is one of the main differentiations.

I don't know how anyone thinks p4k would give this less than a 9.0

lol @ so many people chimping out over this album because it was too hard for them
i bet its the first experimental album some of you have heard lol
its getting a 9.5+ sojust log off shitheads

>>34850304
After what happened with 20/20, it's reasonable to at least think they're going to lowball them. They've been doing it a lot lately, especially Greene and Berman. But they have a habit of doing that.

>>34850290
It can be a good thing too since he can pretty much deny saying anything, basically he is always right now.

>>34850368
>implying I wasn't always always right

>>34850385
Shaddup Hampus.

If this gets a better rating than The Terror than Pitchfork deserves to die a fiery death.

>>34850342
well they do have to account for 'accessibility' in their scores. if something is too hard and they rate it too high then they might ruin their credibility as a source for easy, digestible, 'indie' music which must be what 90% of their web traffic depends on them for. so they are aware that they can't be too adventurous and STH might be too 'out there' especially with those ambient tracks.

>>34850442

They gave WOLF the exact same score as The Terror. You should already be mad.

>>34850442
>implying The Terror's score wasn't fair
I don't even like Berman and that was a well-made review.

>>34850461
The Seer wasn't exactly the most dissonant record, but it was hardly the most accessible record from last year, and it was #5 on their end of the year list after receiving a 9. I honestly think a lot of this has to do with preconceived notions and that people are right in saying that Pitchfork play it safe these days by giving an album a score that is near their already-existing metacritic score. They've been doing it a lot recently.

>>34850514
sup crazimum

>>34850514
well they do promote some more challenging stuff sometimes but they'll generally stay on the safe side. they know their market and they know their function, if people want more challenging stuff, they aren't exactly going to be reading p4k (their writing was always shit anyway, even before they 'got big')

I like the ambient tracks. Literally the only part that I don't like is the "Let's talk about gender baby/ let's talk about you and me" part in "Full of Fire." The rest of the song is so fucking cool and then that little couplet is just... there. The voice transformation they do with the vocal is cool but the line itself is pretty mediocre. Honestly one of the only things making me do anything other than wholeheartedly endorse this album.

As for Old Dreams: finally someone did something new with Godspeed You! Black Emperor. Even Godspeed themselves didn't pull it off as well. Actually seriously, listen to it back to back with "We Drift Like Worried Fire." They are pretty similar!

>>34850582
NM working at the library and posting whenever I get a break.

:33

>>34850609
I don't think that their writing on the whole was ever shit, but they've always hired shitty writers despite the fact that they suck at reviewing music. It's funny, because Ryan's reviews were the worst at times, and he was the fucking founder. Then you had guys like Jason Josephes that actually wrote good reviews for Pitchfork back in the day, and Ryan got rid of him and some of his reviews for some crazy reason, keeping Brent DiCrescenzo, a fucking horrible writer, around for 4 more years. They have great writers, but Ryan Schreiber has made some very bad decisions.

Just bought the deluxe

PUTTING ONE FOOT IN FRONT OF THE OTHER

PUTTING ONE FOOT IN FRONT OF THE OTHER

>>34850736
that bit sounds like old school house, I can see me in a dance floor in the 80s while listening to that track

it will probably get panned. The singles were kind of misleading, the album has its fair share of contemplative moments and slow build ups that might put off people who were expecting something closer to Silent Shout or Fever Ray (mostly because of Tooth For An Eye).

>>34850835
Like I said, 20/20 (even though that still got BNM)

silent shout wuz better
a lot better

8.9
Taking risks

7/10
Even thought it is bad and overrated.

Nothing but hype

I don't know why so many people have a hard time getting this album or claim that it is all hype. It is genuinely good and inventive.

>>34851113

>What is an opinion

You guys... I'm listening to it right now and... I don't think I like it.

It's just "not my type of music". It bores me, it doesn't grab me in any way, I don't like her vocals AT ALL...

I think I may be a pleb. What do?

>>34851163
listen to music that you do like instead?

>>34851163
stay peln

>>34851143
It is objectively creative and inventive. I can't see how anyone could call it shit, it is well written and textured, the production is excellent and the using lots of unusual sounds. Not to someone's taste is one thing but it's not shit.

I love Wrap your arms around me. It's absolutely stunning

>>34851163
Kill yourself

>>34851163
fucking plenbv

>>34851205
>It is objectively creative and inventive.
Nice argument.

>>34851163

Strange, her vocals are among some of the only female ones I enjoy.

Maybe I'm just sexist or something, but my preference is to hear dudes singing/yelling.

>>34851205

>It is objectively creative and inventive

Put a little more effort into your posts please. 0/10

>>34851249
Nice counter argument.

>>34851250

I'm really into strained voices, but for some reason I just don't like hers at all.

But I do like that part in the first song where she's all like

"Another child is to suck on my thuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>34851256
Same to you. Explain to me how it is not creative and inventive.

>>34851304

Because it isn't. There.

>Opinions

>>34851250
>my preference is to hear dudes singing/yelling.

son you might be a homo

>>34851346
you sure showed him

>>34851287
her vocals are way too forced kawaii uguu

>>34851425

Not my fault you didn't get the point.

>>34851445
How is creativeness an opinion? The point just wasn't valid. Even if it was an opinion you still gave no reasons for it not being.

>>34849581
Simply a waste.

In the post-modernist world we live in today, it's oh so common to see something as this is. A golden covered trove of wonders to be exploited by the disgusting varmint of the world. There is no reasoning behind a matter such as that of moliminous as this. Opening off with what seems to be only the tip of another bulimarexia in the world, it seems as if all predictions were correct. I try to go into anabasises with an open mind, yet this one I felt challenged. I knew from the very beginning I was listening only to hyped up novelty, that of eremite and related. It felt like nothing had ever showed up, nothing had ever gone.

I continued my listening and nothing was a surprise. The dermatoglyphics of the non-music and often dull points made this extremely displeasing, and as such there was nothing to be gained. Nothing to be desired, nothing to ever make any change. It's simply a seriatim, to be forgotten merely days into the future. The future seems impossible for this electronic duo, however, and it only shows how naive and anxious they were to pump out whatever they could with no quality control whatsoever. The varmints ate it up. The longueur made no difference to them, as though an Orwellian. It was not only a waste of our precious time, but a waste of my ears. It left nothing to be desired, you cannot improve upon a piece such as this. Only look back and olla podrida. The malapropism wasn't anything different from works such as Merriweather Post Pavillion or The Money Store. Yet we treat us such, different. What are the differences in these? Therblig, and we all can't simply put our minds around it. And that's the auditory tricks of The Knife, again, the disgusting varmint of the music world. Simply put it on in the background and smile and nod, but it's simply jericho all in the end, a pile of something not tangible by us.

>>34851528
hahahahaha you're posting that again after your butthurt embarrassment yesterday?

>>34851550
Don't reply to me if you're just going to harass me.

>7.4

>>34851569
But it's fun and you're a pretentious cock

>>34851580
Fun is not a valid music critique.

>>34849714
>implying anco fans wont enjoy this record as well

>>34851491
Because creativity is productivity. What somebody sees as progression, another person sees as a step in the wrong direction. And depending on the way you look at it, you could say that EVERYTHING is creative. Nothing has ever been done before the way it is..

>>34851598
Neither is that diarrhoea you just posted

No idea but I'll randomly guess 8.3.

It's a great album but it's really lacking in focus. If they cut out Old Dreams, Fracking Fluid Injection and trimmed it down a little more to about 60 minutes length it would've been MUCH better.

-1 Best Pleb Tier

Karin was quite cute back in the day
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3AmLtM1wxc

>>34851681
>implying she ain't qt no mo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-83lft0IABE

>>34849892
it's true though, that's exactly what's happening.

>>34851528
already read this bullshit review yesterday

>>34850342
but the knife fits with their political agenda better, that alone bumps it up to top 8's/9's based on significance and popularity as well

Its got about 6 or 7 song of the year contenders on it

>>34851205
at some points it seems like they just thought they'd put whatever sounds they could fit onto the beat of the song just kind of willy nilly. it's a shame that that makes them somehow geniuses

>>34851981
>but the knife fits with their political agenda better,
Couple of the writers were complaining on twitter about the political stuff

>>34851528
>>34851569
>>34851598
I'm sorry, but are you trying to be taken seriously? You're easily one of the worst tripfags, bar none
>in b4 "but he's not"
Namefag then.

>>34852072
well i guess that depends on who reviews it then.

if lindsay salad reviews expect a 9+

Every track is monumental too me.

I if was pitchfork, i wouldnt hesitate to give it a score over 9.5

>>34851981
I don't think that's a valid representation of their score, at least from Pitchfork's side and how they tend to do things. They always merit the importance of outside context, at least to some degree, and they'd probably find a reason to use the political direction of this album in relation to the rest of their music as an act of desperation or something else within that realm. I could see them giving them BNM, but nothing higher than a 9.

>>34852127
I honestly doubt Zoladz would give it a 9 or higher, even with how she writes things.

>>34850171
Come on, let's be honest. It's still funny.

>>34850180
Isn't that what they've always done? Loads of their review scores have no rhyme or reason.

They gave TIAY a fucking 6.9 the plebs

But the last paragraph of the review is interesting:

"The uninterrupted stretch of "Pigeons" into "Seeds" is the only moment on Tomorrow, in a Year where this is recognizably the work of the Knife, and not coincidentally it's the most thrilling and vital music on the record.

Reconciling their boundless ambitions with their crowd-pleasing instincts, they hit upon a sweet spot that only Laurie Anderson and few others have managed to locate-- a clearing where pop and the avant-garde meet and make each other freshly strange and inviting.

Who knows what kind of reception this will receive; if it's any kind of prologue to an epiphany that allows whole albums of music as inspired as "Pigeons" and "Seeds", however, maybe we'll look back at it in five years as the moment the Knife first went next level"

Is STH that next level?

>>34852226
They haven't always done that. Up until 2010 or right around that time, they really had a knack for dissecting an album from writer to writer on a personal level. Now it feels like the website as a whole is saturated with reviews that appeal only to people familiar with the piece of music being reviewed already, almost like they're tagging along instead of leading. Even individual writers who have been around for years aren't writing as good as they used to, apart from a few of the better ones. That's just mah onion though.

Why do you plebs discuss pitchfork more than the actual album? Afraid you might like/dislike it, only to find out pitchfork had a different opinion?

>>34852567
I take you haven't been here for a few days...

I just made this, is it any good?

>>34849652

bitchy noob music

>>34852914
No.

>>34852914
its difficult to make a chart for the knife, because they only have a handfull of albums, and their sound changes alot on each one

throw me a url to it

>>34853093
www.google.com

>>34852914
why do you feel the need to shit out all those maymay buzzwords? can't you write like a normal person?

>>34853133
I can but it's more fun this way, there is nothing wrong with using buzzwords refering to le /mu/ culture.

>>34853227
>fun this way
i can assure you otherwise
topple yourself now

>>34853133
>no fun allowed
he didn't even use that much memes
>2deep3u
>Privilege Status: Checked
and that privilege thing is at least related in some way... no?

Overrated album general?

>>34853304
>entry level
>2deep3u
>-core
>"how to into" / "into" as a verb
>"essentials"
>"experimental as fuck"
can people grow up and stop writing like this, it's not funny
life is not funny
no maymays

>>34853362
STH isn't overrated.

>>34853362
i agree thats overrated, but shaking the habitual is something else

>>34851681
tfw she's as old there as I am today

>>34853465

>>34853472
>>34853480
Its weakest points are defended as "genius subliminal messaging, 3deep5u patrician-core", when in reality the album is full of junk that if skimmed out, would make the album as a whole much more enjoyable to a broader audience.

Sitting through a half hour of uninteresting noise doesn't strike me as appealing.

>>34853561
I liked Old Dreams and Fracking tho.

There is alot of interesting noises on Old Dreams specifically.

>>34853561
>enjoyable to a broader audience.

But who cares, thats not how art should work
They have no obligation to please evrybody

It appeals to a specific audience, so it should be no surprise that /mu/ is a house divided when it comes to this album.

People have very specific tastes, that's all. Nobody's obligated to like something because it's the weeks new flavor.

>>34853465
I don't see a problem with "essentials" and "experimental as fuck"? where's the meme? You could say "entry level" and "how to into" are phrases only used on /mu/, but who the fuck cares. "entry level" made sense in the context it was used and would it really make so much difference to you if he said "how to GET into"?

>>34853665
because it typifies the infantile attitude of the typical fucktard /mu/tant maymay spouter. just look at what /mu/ did to death grips and one realises how important it is to put a stop to the cancer. the knife are actually worth saving from this cancerism

>>34853750
>The Knife
>worth saving

They literally stabbed themselves in the throat with this album.

>>34853750
jesus christ you're all kinds of mad

>>34853798
hardly, that couldn't be further from the truth

>>34853828
>all this damage control

It has many obvious flaws, and will be quickly panned. It's the same hype-goggled train that came to station when mbv arrived recently.

>>34853890
Yeah, good luck with that

>>34853890
You can't really compare this to a comeback album from an ageing rock band.

>>34853890
>will be quickly panned
by whom? and why would I care for someones else opinion?

>>34853890
It's been getting glowing reviews from everyone. The only one below a 8 has been Drowned In Sound, which got a 7.

It'll be rated for what it is, not compared to previous works from themselves or similar bands.
>>34853970
Obviously people care, when they're hyped for a BNM label.

>>34854040
Oh so you are talking about p4k? please leave.

>>34854108
>projecting

>>34851163
>listening to an album for the first time while posting on /mu/

>>34854137
I think that means something other than what you think it means

>>34854137
How am I projecting? You started the discussion with
>It has many obvious flaws, and will be quickly panned.
as if when p4k says it is bad would prove that it is bad.

Oh and
>It's the same hype-goggled train that came to station when mbv arrived recently.
p4k gave it a 9.1, doesn't this make it objectively good?
>It'll be rated for what it is

shaking the habitual got a glowing review in the wire magazine, so whoever is saying that it's will be panned by critics or whatever can shut the fuck up

>>34853890
>It has many obvious flaws, and will be quickly panned.
Most of the review are already out, they are all positive. I can't find one panning

The guardian was the closet to a panning, and even it admited that the some of the album was brilliant

>>34854255
Pitchfork wasn't mentioned as the one review that shines over all others. Simply stating that when people say they don't care what others think, but are anxious to see how it's rated, it's sad.

>>34854370
That's why I asked "by whom?" and you were talking about the "BNM label" there >>34854040
So its obvious you mean p4k.

>>34854424
The label itself, not the source of it.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2013/apr/07/knife-shaking-the-habitual-review

I like the way the guardian give 2 reviews

>>34854481
Normally BNM is connected to p4k.

>>34854508
kitty empire reviews for the observer which is the sunday paper

>>34854508
I hate the way Kitty Empire sometimes writes long reviews and often short ones. Her James Blake review is awful because she describes it as "more of the same".

>>34854542
That's true, but as the poster mentioned, they didn't care about what other people think, but a label like that is somehow important.

So when exactly does Pitchfork add their next patch of reviews?

Is there some kind of schedule?

>>34854699
Tonight at midnight CST.

>>34854699
My guess is on Tuesday, when the album is officially released.

Also, my guess for a score is that it will be over 9 or under 7. Either way, it's still AOTYSF for me.

>>34854751
So they will release the The Knife review at midnight? Thank god then the discussion is finally over.

Anybody else really enjoying Stay Out Here?

>>34854799
yep

Anyone want to zip a 320 of this album for me?

"ready... ready to check my privilege"

>>34854794
He was replying to my question of "when exactly does Pitchfork add their next patch of reviews?". That doesn't have to include Shaking the Habitual.

>>34854876
>ready to lose the privilege

Rustling The Hipsters

>>34854787
It's dropping on monday actually (in Europe at least).

>>34854889
I know, I was just making an assumption.

>>34854966
I'm supposed to have a download by now since i ordered the vinyl, but i havent got it yet

>>34854889
I can't imagine the STH review wouldn't be the first thing they review this week.

>>34855067
I'm still holding out on that Noctourniquet review

After a whole day of listening to STH loudly I put on Old Dreams and it was so relaxing. In the beginning I didn't ike it at all but now...

>>34855110
what

>>34855165
never mind

>>34852914
but s/t is the most accessible, surely that should be the starting point?

I'm a huge faggot please rape my face. also, StH is 10 bnm and p4k is the only way i know if an album is good

Fantano review is probably coming tonight too.

>>34855566
yeah, but it's not as good as deep cuts or silent shout. I think there are two ways to approach a band you don't know, either start with the first or with the best.

>>34849581
last two digits of my post is the score trust me i got illuminati

>>34855584
you forgot to put meme in the email field

People will loose their shit if pitchfork give out 2 albums BNM in the same day.

It would be insane

>>34855731
hey you're not me

The Knife-7/10
Deep Cuts-8.5/10
Silent Shout-10/10
Fever Ray-10/10
Tomorrow, In A Year-7/10
Shaking The Habitual-9/10

Thats how I see it

>>34855823
aggreed

>>34855823
Wouldn't rate Fever Ray so hight and would give Deep Cuts a 9.

>>34855823
but fever ray was Karin Dreijer Andersson's solo project and TIAD was an experimental ambient soundtrack

>>34855925
TIAY*

>>34855682
never with the best, otherwise everything else is a disappointment in comparison

>>34855925
Yeah i know


the second disc of tiay was not ambient btw

>>34855823
their self-titled should be rated higher than Deep Cuts imo

>>34849819
not even bismuth, dude.
>2013
>ur a pleb

suckaniggadick.jpeg>>34851163

>>34855823
the knife - 6/10
deep cuts - 7/10
silent shout - 8/10
fever ray - 9.5 /10
Tomorrow in a Year - 9/10
Shaking the Habitual - 10/10


>ftfy

>>34852914
clearly the superior knife flowchart

there's an anger in this album that's quite unsettling.
I've always known they're hardcore feminists but the lyrics here coupled with the videos and liv strömqvist makes me fear for the intactness of my penis. they've never been this fucking bitter and nasty
album is pretty cool though

7.4

>>34856973
Plebchart

>>34857080
keep telling yourself the albums that came before it are anything but generic electropop and the ones that followed are not tryhard 2deep4u bullshit that lacks any substance, maybe one day you'll even believe it

>>34857080
>>34857117
2manybuzzwords4me

>>34857117
>generic electropop
Deep Cuts was the blueprint for all the generic electro pop that came out for the rest of the decade

>>34852914
could you make the colours less offensive please

a

>>34857152
the knife is a fucking buzzband, what did you expect?

>>34857175
which is why it in retrospect isn't very interesting or unique

The Knife-9/10
Deep Cuts-7.5/10
Silent Shout-9/10
Fever Ray-10/10
Tomorrow, in a Year-8/10
Shaking The Habitual-9.5/10

>>34857223
So because lots of people ripped it off, it isnt interesting ?

Spotty and far, far too long.

>>34857175
>being this delusional

>>34857270
No, because it wasn't interesting to begin with

It's going to get 9.0+, unless they decided to be #edgy and #unique, and give it a high score without BNM, like 8.1.

Unrelated to the Fork, does anyone have the 320 rip on hand? I'd be grateful.

>>34857569
do you guys even torrents?

>>34857606
is that the cd rip or the stream rip?

>>34856984
don't mistake passion for anger. wrap your arms around me, without you my life would be boring, and stay out here are decidedly about warm and fuzzy feelings

good article here:
http://www.mtvhive.com/2013/04/05/the-knife-shaking-the-habitual/

>>34857726

By now it’s routine: any act who’s ever touched a synth will, at some point in their career, either namedrop or get compared to the Knife. Just a few of them: Icona Pop, Niki and the Dove, Lykke Li, Purity Ring, AlunaGeorge, Kate Boy, Chairlift, CHVRCHES, Charli XCX, iamamiwhoami, Grimes, Robyn, even Britney Spears when she was all innovative. Just as a Kate Bush comparison has become standard for any female vocalist whose voice is a little loopy, or a Fiona Apple comparison for anyone shedding feelings, the Swedish duo is now shorthand for any act, from Sweden or not, who makes dance music slightly a-kilter. The comparisons aren’t wrong — in Deep Cuts’ deep cuts are the blueprints for about half of 2012’s indie-pop hits.

It’s just that now the Knife, for their first proper album in years, has delivered a Foucault-quoting concept slab instead, where the “singles” are umpteen-minute sonic threshers and everything else is doomy sprawl. And it’s great.

I love Deep Cuts, but mine it inspired some shit clones

>>34857893
yep. But it's a bit unfair to put Robyn there. Since The Knife produced and wrote "whos that girl" with her.

>>34857893
Its weird, i think deep cuts has been more influential than silent shout

Just because its more accessible

>>34855590
Considering he didn't like Tomorrow in a Year he'll probably give this a mediocre rating.

>>34858625
I like fantano but i think his review of that was a little off.

He said something along the lines of "we have to separate the album from its concept, because the sounds and textures of the album have nothing to do with the concept"

With Tomorrow, in a year, that is completely false. I don't care whether he liked it or not, but i think he didn't really do his research

>>34858625
Can't post a screenshot right now, but on twitter he said the album was "insane", and that it was "light-years ahead".

>>34858772
>"insane", and that it was "light-years ahead".
He said it was light years ahead of kid cudi, in terms of what he has to review first.

Don't think hew as talking about the music

My source tells me most of p4k dont agree on it.

Its not getting a good score

>>34858822
Oh, OK.

I don't really understand how twitter works, my bad.

>>34858822
Saying that something is light years ahead and referring to the fact that it's chronologically first seems like an odd idiom. I'm thinking he's pretty taken by it.

>>34857893
Wow, you just name dropped a shitload of horrible bands.

>>34859331
Its from an article, look at who its replying too

>>34859331
Read what he said at the end

5 to light 6

>>34859331
Lykke Li, Chairlift, Robyn, Grimes and especially iamamiwhoami are pretty good tho

I'd give it a 9.8

Very beautiful, but at the same time dark. Just like Fever Ray

>>34859555
It's much worse than FR.

>>34859596
nuh uh

>>34850269
why dont you get a trip hampus

>>34859690
why bother when it's so obvious when he posts

>>34849581
whatever/whatever

>>34849730

Seems about right but I think the Knife is looking at a 9+ rating

>>34859973
>Seems about right but I think the Knife is looking at a 9+ rating
You're in for a shock.

Its getting a surprising low rating

>>34859690
because then we don't get to read hampus lovely reviews for a full three months

>>34860017
how do you know?

>>34860272
Hid dad probably works for pitchfork

Ryan Schreiber has children in every state

Fantano will do a 30 minute review

with 10 minutes of him humming in the middle.

>>34851528
this is beautiful, thank you

>>34862124
you know its a joke right?
blf is a troll

>>34862182
I don't know what to believe anymore. Seriously this post just changed my entire worldview, I'm having 3 existential crises at the same time. My life may never be the same

bump

>>34865623
why would you bump a thread based on shitty p4k bullshit

>>34865662
bump

>>34855823
The Knife-6/10
Deep Cuts-8/10
Hannah Med H-3/10
Silent Shout-10/10
Fever Ray-9/10
Tomorrow, In A Year-10/10
Shaking The Habitual-9/10

no review yet?

>>34868856
Plenty of reviews out g read some of them

The Wire did a good one. They arent fucking plebs like p4k, they know how to approach an album like this

>>34868996
link?

Almost every single review has been positive, with a couple average ones. I haven't seen a single panning.

Pitchfork will pan it, they enjoy making power plays

Ant Fant gave it a 9

>>34873210
>>34873210
no one cares, i'd rather know what my grandma thinks of it than that fat fuck