>>78491839Bullshit
Take two different jazz tracks and listen to them. They'll sound the same, with minor differences like a few tempo changes, but the basic sound will always stay the same unless you listen to some Free Jazz or something
I don't hate Jazz completely, I like some albums when I'm in the mood for that but there is a reason why it's dead. It lacks the complexity, substance and art aspect of the classical music to be appealing for someone who wants to dedicate their time, learning musical theory and history behind the music. It's kind of a bridge between popular music (rock, electronic, hip hop, pop) and classical. Except it lacks the accessibility of the former and isn't as engaging as latter.
It's basically a relic of it's time (first half of the 20th century) and only because that was the only thing that black people were good at and they were popular because of that because it all seemed new for the people at that time but once popular music became really "popular" (60's), Jazz time was up. That's why they tried to innovate by fusing it with other genres like rock but it was only just delaying the inevitable.
