>>56242163
This chart is stupid.
You're stupid.
Trying to classify music in stupidly vague terms is a waste of time.
You know that plenty of plastic artists were commissioned to do work, right? By your terms, that wouldn't be art. And that's just plain dumb.
There's music with little artistic integrity (top 40 pop, lazy plagiarism or just copying someone's style without adding anything of your own). But all music is art. It's just that there's good and bad art too.
Your little classifying system is so silly that even you'll have problems sorting out its nonsense.
What idiots like you don't understand is that art, as a concept, isn't some holy pristine grail that automatically grants quality. By actively calling music you don't enjoy or don't deem deserving of the "magnificence" of being called art you're acting like a clown. Grow up.