>>54614424
So...why should horrid double standards be allowed to persist? Does no one else see how fucking hypocritical it is? Why is X wrong to do to a person of Group A, but okay to do to a person of Group B? If X = "something shitty to do to a person", can't we all agree that X should just be avoided in general? Instead we see, X being allowed to be enacted upon members of Group B simply out of retribution, because T amount of time ago, a certain portion of members of Group B did X against a certain portion of Group A...AND if you disagree with this mentality, you are told that your opinion and views have no merit and should be completely dismissed.
Does that not seem absolutely fucking retarded?
Sure, we can all ignore the article. Everyone in this thread knows it's a load of horse shit...but there are plenty of easily manipulable, bleeding-heart dipshits on the internet that eat this stuff up, because they're told if they don't then they're racists, and bigoted people, and no one wants to be labeled that.
It's fucking backwards-thinking, old world logic.