/mu/ - Music (Temp full images)

>>55720973

>>55714009
https://mega.co.nz/#!t4QHHYQC!V8BComEdDDP4c1O0_QyG_Mv7Kyc96FAs3bOfDKFWFbY
https://mega.co.nz/#!wwhR0Roa!kPVq7vNF2I9YehRitOIVJEqSgdDy0L3fXwQqZ5nFwPI
https://mega.co.nz/#!wl5BxaZA!kvWHUwqLk7MzJNBA4qQLTlVooX7mqEkkrBUMLQsPlO8
https://mega.co.nz/#!shwxGKgT!c_x41ZVua_l5evtLOEkA33I5TgfnA6zkPL5LsRkNo_o
https://mega.co.nz/#!p9xXQBoZ!W_BEOc743BlkwC4cACvjGuwjqB9nJTTtP4haYRdw9zY
https://mega.co.nz/#!A9xxHK7R!hRhc91Q_N69YECxQgseKd_1kOXPnfp-QIr_Y8l3K6Rc
https://mega.co.nz/#!VspXiBII!eIb2ES8nX16h2-Pjl3eOLyfhhaTRwq5278frFi9xvdI
https://mega.co.nz/#!BggWgLBa!aCKkSWggc2wC8H8LqyKFPOQMK-xH9YqKjLYxbca1-3Y
https://mega.co.nz/#!g0IzBBrb!thJHbLiMJDVBzQckLvmofgN97S2U8VRswyM9sd0bLs0
https://mega.co.nz/#!EhwX2BgI!gqN1M0RKgj0-_tq2i55bScGqHYxD-027gEFd1n0yccc
https://mega.co.nz/#!RlwwBCYL!EvEM9Tfhog8mBXEPU1hVOMzjiqQQfXJt65zJn4rB0q4
https://mega.co.nz/#!s0Y0wZ5J!ai6xuSRML7kA7IlO2he5dD0WMT_2SjMYGTAzf2w7l60
https://mega.co.nz/#!4swzUIqZ!ZnMXLNdBKvztQNFuTp3hPLs7ORAMGsdyGaOmsuXfJCI
https://mega.co.nz/#!NgZ0TDQD!mPgpKOnTrgRmLXIPO1ZeWWweT37sYlTtx7WgbLGk_W4
https://mega.co.nz/#!RlxxjCLS!qvMBZzKO5NGbxU7p1N9nSCJFBunAunLJWha7C2mQS14

Enjoy!

(Pic not related to upload.)

Which piece from classical music goes like TUH TUH DUH tudududu-TUH (pause) TUH TUH DUH tudududu-TUH

Then comes a slower part

It's pretty well known, I just can't figure it out right now

trying to get into classical, just never sure of which versions of things to get since obviously Bach and them didn't put out albums

help a μtant out?

Hey guys, I am trying to into classical, but the link at the bottom of this pic doesn't have any of the albums. Is there a separate link thing that does? Or do I need to just find them on my own? Also modern electronic classical appreciated that's not Stockhausen/Eno/that Breadwinner album. Sorry for the plebness.

Hi /mu/, I'm about to get some paperwork done and want to be able to focus on that shit. Any idea which album to listen to?

>maybe one of these?

I don't really know what I'm doing learning this piano. I have a 'beginner self-teach' book but it's super basic. I've also been messing around with Synthesia and learning songs, but I feel like I'm not actually learning the piano. I'm just memorizing finger motions.
How do you learn an instrument for real? I mean sure I can learn Jingle Bells or some shit but I feel like that isn't helping me learn anything else.

What is the best way to start with classical music?
Should I get compilations of composers or particular works?
Who should I start with and how to preceed?

Please guide me here, I'm in need of some classical and this time I want to be aware what I am listening to/

>>44596260
> where to start looking?
looks like you enjoy Classical, Baroque, and Romantic era music, so keep looking in those periods, find more composers in that area.
If you like Bach, you'll probably like Telemann,
Chopin: Try Arensky or Debussy,
Mozart: check out Haydn
Beethoven: Check out Berlioz of Wagner
> which composers were objectively the best?
Your list covers some of the most respected and widely praised composers.
> how is classical music usually distributed?
Plenty of concerts, CDs, I find lots on youtube...
> which recordings to look for?
I'm not a pro on the recordings side... I'm more a composer than a fine recordings connoisseur...
> who records the pieces of classical composers?
Performers. Usually professional recording performers, you make it their life work to make great recordings. Often they are also concert-giving performers as well as recording performers

> what is your favorite non-classical album?
Pig Destroyer - Terrifyer

>>44416425
No Worries, I'm sure the other trips/anons will show up at some stage and contribute some more recommendations...

>>44380036
This chart may also help. Can't seem to find my baroque hipster-core chart, sorry...

>>43845871
>a handful of avant-teens circlejerking on their tumblr blogs
That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about opinions commonly expressed on /mu/ and widely accepted as conventional wisdom. Not too long ago, you'd see "rank Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven" threads in which any post which didn't put Mozart at third place would be goggled at or mocked. Now the "Big 3" are a lot closer to each receiving the same amount of respect.

Just like it used to be accepted as conventional wisdom here that the Baroque and especially Romantic periods were categorically better than the Classical period. People's viewpoints are much more diverse and nuanced now.

the link in this chart doesn't work. is there a working shared folder for this?

>>39997911
Oh get real. People had the exact same gripes and prejudices about the fanbase then that they do now, opinions about trips like LNYD were just as polarized, and even _if_ general thread quality could be said to have declined, it certainly hasn't declined any more steeply than the board as a whole. By and large, discussions followed the traditional /mu/ formula, with long stretches of casual statements of opinion and general aimless bickering, occasionally punctuated by a vicious argument over some in-depth topic or by a link share binge.

You know, just like they do right now, as well as every other type of /mu/ thread.

Still believe in some phony golden age? Here, I've brought proof; classically-inclined /mu/tants labored for the better part of 2010 to create an essentials chart, and pic related is the best they were able to come up with. Yeesh.

>>39783327
>Fy0 was spamming CP for matthew and everyone was listening to the Lonliest Cowgirls

When was this? I was busy arguing in the classical threads and trying to browbeat them into putting Renaissance music on the shitty essentials chart they were making. We must not have posted in the same threads, due to different levels of music interest.

>>39249614
Seriously. Pic related, too.

>>39249597
>>39249603
>childish namecalling

>>38777305
I don't. I get frustrated with people who are convinced it's the be-all-end-all of classical music and construct abominations like pic related because of this mindset, but I don't have anything against the actual music. Or at least, not all of it.

I can appreciate why that distinction might be confusing.

>>38777367
Eh, it's definitely behind the Classical period. And the Renaissance. And the Modernist era. But yeah, after those, I'd say it's probably one of the best.

>>38223730

>>37661372
OP here. I feel the same way. That's why I made this thread, because it seemed like a good idea in theory, and because the only similar chart I've seen /mu/ make has been... less than satisfactory, even from the perspective of the people who made it.

>>37653793
>There are better Classical charts from /mu/

I hope you aren't talking about this one, because it's the only one I can find and it's shit. Also, no working links.

>>37642099
I used to criticize its over-representation in /mu/ charts such as pic related, and as per usual people took it too far.

That said,
>implying Schubert isn't fundamentally a Classical composer

>>37615309
>reduce it to its most important and influential parts.

It's funny because that's what the makers of the "official" essential classical chart tried to do, and the piece of shit they ended up with was worse in every possible way.

If you have such a huge problem with CLT's chart, why don't you quit bitching about it and make a better one that everyone will use instead?