[ cgl / con / g / mu / qa / w ] [ index / top / reports / FAQ / DAAS / IG / status / transparency / fuuka ] [ img-search ]
As Dark As My Soul Default Fuuka

/mu/ - Music (Temp full images)

Search:


View post   

>> No.56200726 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, scaruffi.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
56200726

What was he right about?

>> No.55948926 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, 6:10.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55948926

Hes retirement from music reviewing is soemthing that we cannot let happen. Let's write a letter to him (one word for each post) to persuade him to come back to the world of music criticism. The letter will be 200 words long, so the first two hundred one-word posts will be used (anything with more than one word will be ignored).

I'll start: Dear

>> No.55804771 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55804771

What are his qualifications?

>> No.55772710 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55772710

"Readers often ask me why I did not become a musician, since my essays, indirectly, tell a musician what music he should or should not be making. Other readers accuse critics of being merely frustrated people who would like to be the very musicians and stars they "criticize". Again, in my case it goes back to my passion for history and for knowledge. Pythagora, who had a mystic attitude towards things, thought that the audience was more important than the athletes: the athletes were entertaining the audience but the audience was "contemplating" the athletes, and to Pythagora that was more important. Understanding nature was more important than being a part of it. In a sense, when you "contemplate" nature you manage not to be part of it, to be something else, above and beyond it, almost divine."

*tips fedora*

>> No.55753524 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55753524

I don't know if you know but our lord and savior Piero Scaruffi gave Jenny Death a 6.5/10 and a quite positive review, making it the second best DG album.

http://www.scaruffi.com/vol7/hella.html#gov

>> No.55722981 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55722981

>>55722884
lol you are the biggest pleb on this board

try to get yung thugs dick out of your mouth fucking pitchfork drone

>> No.55712154 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55712154

>Piper
8.5
>Psychedelic Sounds Of
7.5
>Pet Sounds
7
>Revolver
5

Looks like we have a clear winner

>> No.55569870 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, scaruffi.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55569870

Is Scaruffi the most cultured person of all-time?

Just give a quick look at the music, literature and cinema sections of his site. It's fucking insane.

>> No.55485338 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, alan alda.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55485338

>>55485249
>>55485271
>>55485275
>>55485276
>>55485290
>>55485304

The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.

In a sense, the Beatles are emblematic of the status of rock criticism as a whole: too much attention paid to commercial phenomena (be it grunge or U2) and too little to the merits of real musicians. If somebody composes the most divine music but no major label picks him up and sells him around the world, a lot of rock critics will ignore him. If a major label picks up a musician who is as stereotyped as can be but launches her or him worldwide, your average critic will waste rivers of ink on her or him. This is the sad status of rock criticism: rock critics are basically publicists working for major labels, distributors and record stores. They simply highlight what product the music business wants to make money from.

>> No.55468270 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55468270

>>55468253
https://youtu.be/gYTqYVHS1lo

>> No.55459072 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, hack.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55459072

Daily reminder that Ultraviolence is better than The Seer.

>> No.55285479 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55285479

One retort I've heard against Scaruffi-haters is that people say "Scaruffi values innovation! He doesn't like anyone who is derivative!"

If that's so, then why does he have Elliott Carter's Symphony of Three Orchestras on his GOAT list? Accessible here under "Most significant works of music 1950-1990 ": http://www.scaruffi.com/jazz/best100.html

That work is derivative of Stockhausen's Gruppen, which already performed the same concept.

>Gruppen (German: Groups) for three orchestras (1955–57) is amongst the best-known compositions of German composer Karlheinz Stockhausen, and is Work Number 6 in the composer's catalog of works. Gruppen is "a landmark in 20th-century music . . . probably the first work of the post-war generation of composers in which technique and imagination combine on the highest level to produce an undisputable masterpiece" (Smalley 1967, 794).

>> No.55280451 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, the face of a serial killer.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55280451

>>55280411

>> No.55252906 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, image[1].jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55252906

yes

>> No.55244151 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
55244151

This is Scaruffi's list of the most significant works of music 1950-1990. Why the fuck do you guys consider him at all legitimate?

1. Shostakovic: Symphony No 15 (1971) [classical]
2. Karlheinz Stockhausen: Gesang der Junglinge (1956) [classical]
3. Charles Mingus: The Black Saint And The Sinner Lady (1963) [jazz]
4. Boulez: Repons (1980) [classical]
5. Carter: Symphony of Three Orchestras (1977) [classical]
6. Ligeti: Double concerto (1972) [classical]
7. Captain Beefheart: Trout Mask Replica (1969) [rock]
8. Lutoslawski: Sinfonia 3 (1983) [classical]
9. John Coltrane: A Love Supreme (1964) [jazz]
10.Part: Tabula rasa (1977) [classical]
11. Robert Wyatt: Rock Bottom (1974) [rock]
12. Gerhard: Concerto for Orchestra (1965) [classical]
13. Faust (1971) [rock]
14. Penderecki: Hiroshima Threnody (1960) [classical]
15. Terry Riley: Rainbow in Curved Air (1968) [electronica]
16. Jon Hassell: Dream Theory In Malaya (1981) [electronica]
17. Meredith Monk: Dolmen Music (1981) [classical]
18. John Fahey: Fare Forward Voyagers (1971) [folk]
19. Albert Ayler: Witches and Devils (1964) [jazz]
20. Velvet Underground & Nico (1967) [rock]
21. Sun Ra: Atlantis (1967) [jazz]
22. Balakauskas: Ostrobothnian Symphony (1989) [classical]
23. Cecil Taylor: Unit Structures (1966) [jazz]
24. Klaus Schulze: Irrlicht (1972) [electronica]
25. Schnittke: Concerto Grosso 5 (1991) [classical]
26. Feldman: Rothko Chapel (1971) [classical]
27. Miles Davis: Kind Of Blue (1959) [jazz]
28. Partch: Revelation (1960) [classical]
29. Tubin: Symphony 8 (196x) [classical]
30. Don Cherry: Mu (1969) [jazz]

>> No.54866584 [View]
File: 29 KB, 548x308, lol.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54866584

>>54866533
hahahaha

>> No.54803791 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54803791

Lets have a music legends thread.

Post people who you think are the most deserving of the Title of Legend, when it comes to music.

You can write a short bio for them if you want

I'll start with any easy one

>Piero "Crazy Legs" Scaruffi is a legendary Italian-American hiker, historian, philosopher, poet, scientist, and art critic. He runs a website containing his music reviews, poetry, photography, and writings about various subjects. He is likely smarter than you about all all things because he has more PhD's and has fucked more bitches than you ever will. He is by many considered a "master patrician" with undeniable taste.

>> No.54686223 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, 12-year-old_spotted.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54686223

>>54686161
>Why are there age limits? why is it illegal to marry a 12-year old?

- Piero Scaruffi

I guess they're just "amateur human beings"

>> No.54635121 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, image.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54635121

>>54634965
lmao what the fuck is going on here, is that scaruffi's pants?

>> No.54482711 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, scruffy.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54482711

>>54482678
>>54482649
looks like we found the bypassed filter fags

how mad are you right now :DD

>> No.54403055 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, piero spots an underage.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54403055

So, how long will it be till Memerick Lamear hype dies down?

>> No.54400833 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, scaruffi.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54400833

You forgot me, /mu/. You have forsaken me. Taste my wrath. SHITPOSTING! Shitposting on you and your descendants.

Forever.

>> No.54304131 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, Scaruffi.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54304131

>>54304070
lol anon trying to make meta jokes, look @ u go! how is your butt though?

>> No.54283244 [View]
File: 30 KB, 548x308, piero spots an underage.jpg [Show reposts] Image reverse search: [iqdb] [google]
54283244

Hey /mu/, show me your groove!



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]