/mu/ - Music (Temp full images)

>>55476098
Here's the core of that issue

The best case scenario is a "no-true-feminist" scenario, where the radical lesbians, those who give a bad name to gender equality, would be ignored. Unfortunately, depending on where you happen to be and who your social group is (if you're mostly browsing /pol/, versus vaping nicotine with your hipster friends at uni), you're going to get exposed to different types of feminists and different opinions about them, and you will of course be molded by that.

If you happen to be of the opinion that feminism is poisonous (and frankly there is no shortage of angry twitter cunts to support that position), then you're going to have a negative connotation with feminism, and believe that obviously, the actual movement is divorced from the dictionary definition. If you are neutral, and talk to your average suburban chick, you're going to walk away with a positive opinion of feminism.

Ultimately the whole argument is just semantics, and has nothing to do with actual ideological differences: you can take two neutral-ish people and divide them in this way, if you present feminism and feminists in different lights. This explains why middle-of-the-roaders can validate their rejection of feminism. The ugly side of the "feminist" movement is enough to discredit the whole thing, if you focus on it.


Of course there are also anti-egalitarians who reject the dictionary definition of feminism as well, but that is another issue.

1. Lower upper class
2. Mew, Kashmir, XTC, Radiohead, The Cure
3. Shoegaze and noise pop

>>47390655
this is actually 100% correct

>>44580780
1/10 because I responded

Before the Beatles, rock was a simple dance music. Any time you hear a chord in a major key rock song beyond a basic I IV V progression, the Beatles did it first (See Help! and Rubber Soul). Anytime you hear a rock song modulate to a new key, the Beatles did it first (Day Tripper). Anytime you hear a time signature change in a rock song, the Beatles did it first (Rain). Anytime you hear a drummer have compositional input in a song as more than just a time keeper, the Beatles did it first (Rubber Soul). Anytime you hear most forms of studio wizardry, the Beatles did it first (Sgt. Pepper's, Rain, others). Proto-Metal? The Beatles did it first (Helter Skelter), with some help from Hendrix. Psychadelic rock? The Beatles did it first (Revolver). Noise rock? The Beatles did it first (Tomorrow Never Knows). Symphonic pop? The Beatles did it first (Eleanor Rigby). Electronic music? The Beatles did it first (Revolution 9). Ambient music? The Beatles did it first (Revolution 9). Anytime you hear distortion play a key role in music, the Beatles did it first (I feel Fine). Anytime you hear a drummer play in matched grip or mic a bass drum, Ringo did it first. Anytime you hear strange instrumentation in a pop or rock song, the Beatles did it first (Norwegian Wood). Anytime you hear sophisticated lyrics in rock music, you can thank the Beatles (Help!, Rubber Soul), with some help from Dylan. Anytime you hear themes or concept albums, you can thank the Beatles (Sgt. Pepper's), with some help from the Beach Boys. The Beatles paved the way for EVERYONE, from the Kinks to Zappa.

Listen to pop music in 1963 and 1967. The difference is unbelievable, and the band that spearheaded all of that was the Beatles. You don't need to read about it; you can actually HEAR it.

>>41989768
Damn str8

I liked Instant Crush

Some metal music, but by no means all.
Doom metal and black meal are pretty cool.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Music/comments/1doal2/of_monsters_and_men_kids_cover_of_mgmt/

>people trying to deny Death Grips are the future of music