>>46852789
Lol! so you think these albums are simultaneously not obscure *and* obscure ? Lol! if you were so willing to help out your 'average /mu/tant', which you clearly do not, you would have provided names 8) you're not here for discussion, you're not here to help, you're to flaunt your 3rd rate avant-teen favourites, most of which hold no water in any of their respective communities but yours 8) but i assume you're as ignorant about your so-called favourites and those communites just as much as you think /mu/ is about your chart 8)
oh. and you've still never provided evidence of noise discussion 8) or even reply to the latter half of the post which i am going to have to assume you agree to 8)